Core list of risks of programmatic approaches for APDMs
| No. | Risks | Risk description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Change in scope (e.g. due to coordination with third parties; late change requests) | This risk is related to gate change requests or late coordination with third parties leading to unanticipated project adjustments |
| 2 | Conformance with regulations/guidelines/design criteria | This risk involves deviations from established design criteria or non-compliance with rules/guidelines/design standards |
| 3 | Constructability issues | This risk is related to poor design or oversight in planning |
| 4 | Coordination with government agencies or other authorities having jurisdiction | This risk involves delays or misalignment with the relevant authorities |
| 5 | Environmental permits and approvals | This risk involves challenges in securing necessary environmental permits and approvals |
| 6 | Financial issues | This risk is related to funding shortages or unexpected cost escalations |
| 7 | Geotechnical conditions | This risk is related to unforeseen soil or subsurface conditions |
| 8 | Incomplete project scope definition/design uncertainty | This risk involves ambiguity or lack of clarity in project requirements |
| 9 | Legal challenges and changes in law | This risk involves legal disputes or regulatory changes during the project development process |
| 10 | Market conditions (e.g. price volatility, labor availability, etc.) | This risk is related to fluctuating material prices, labor shortages, or supply chain disruptions. |
| 11 | Political risks/opposition | This risk involves changes in political leadership or public opposition |
| 12 | Railroad involvement | This risk is related to railroad coordination and agreements during the project development process |
| 13 | Right-of-way (ROW) and easements | This risk is related to delays or challenges in obtaining ROW and easements |
| 14 | Schedule/phasing issues (aggressive schedule, restricted work window, etc.) | This risk involves aggressive timelines and phasing construction for different scales of highway projects |
| 15 | Staff experience/availability | This risk is related to the limited availability or lack of skilled personnel, in terms of years of experience and the number of APDM projects |
| 16 | Use of new procurement methods/contracts | This risk involves adopting unfamiliar methods or contract types |
| 17 | Utility issues | This risk refers to unforeseen utility conflicts in transportation projects |
| No. | Risks | Risk description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Change in scope (e.g. due to coordination with third parties; late change requests) | This risk is related to gate change requests or late coordination with third parties leading to unanticipated project adjustments |
| 2 | Conformance with regulations/guidelines/design criteria | This risk involves deviations from established design criteria or non-compliance with rules/guidelines/design standards |
| 3 | Constructability issues | This risk is related to poor design or oversight in planning |
| 4 | Coordination with government agencies or other authorities having jurisdiction | This risk involves delays or misalignment with the relevant authorities |
| 5 | Environmental permits and approvals | This risk involves challenges in securing necessary environmental permits and approvals |
| 6 | Financial issues | This risk is related to funding shortages or unexpected cost escalations |
| 7 | Geotechnical conditions | This risk is related to unforeseen soil or subsurface conditions |
| 8 | Incomplete project scope definition/design uncertainty | This risk involves ambiguity or lack of clarity in project requirements |
| 9 | Legal challenges and changes in law | This risk involves legal disputes or regulatory changes during the project development process |
| 10 | Market conditions (e.g. price volatility, labor availability, etc.) | This risk is related to fluctuating material prices, labor shortages, or supply chain disruptions. |
| 11 | Political risks/opposition | This risk involves changes in political leadership or public opposition |
| 12 | Railroad involvement | This risk is related to railroad coordination and agreements during the project development process |
| 13 | Right-of-way (ROW) and easements | This risk is related to delays or challenges in obtaining ROW and easements |
| 14 | Schedule/phasing issues (aggressive schedule, restricted work window, etc.) | This risk involves aggressive timelines and phasing construction for different scales of highway projects |
| 15 | Staff experience/availability | This risk is related to the limited availability or lack of skilled personnel, in terms of years of experience and the number of APDM projects |
| 16 | Use of new procurement methods/contracts | This risk involves adopting unfamiliar methods or contract types |
| 17 | Utility issues | This risk refers to unforeseen utility conflicts in transportation projects |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.