Table 1.

Applications of user-engaged design approaches and contexts

 ResidentialOfficeSchoolHigher educationHealth careRefugee campPublic buildings
User-engaged approachesHousesflatsElders homeKindergartenSecondary schoolUniversityLobby
PrOEHeidari et al. (2014), Lertlakkhanakul et al. (2008) Breadsell et al. (2019), Niu et al. (2016), Shin et al. (2017) (Tseng and Giau, 2021)Agha-Hossein et al. (2013), Globa et al. (2022), Ildiri et al. (2022), Juan et al. (2021), Moloney et al. (2020), Shen et al. (2013)  Coleman and Robinson (2018), Frelin and Grannäs (2022), Kuliga et al. (2015) Shen et al. (2013)  Alzoubi et al. (2010), Baldauf et al. (2021), Ferrante and Villani (2022), Kumar et al. (2011), Schaumann et al. (2019, 2020), Shepley et al. (2012), van der Zwart and van der Voordt (2015)   
UCDReisinger et al. (2022)  Lahtinen et al. (2014) Bullinger et al. (2010), Cha et al. (2019), Heydarian et al. (2017), Ruohomäki et al. (2015)    Lee et al. (2023)    
PDMarinovic (2023), Soikkeli et al. (2023) Kee (2014), Sharmin and Khalid (2022)   Economidou et al. (2023) Baek (2023), Manahasa et al. (2021), Victorino and Henriques (2021)   Borges and Silva (2015), Marjaana et al. (2020), Payne et al. (2015) Albadra et al. (2021), Jaradat and Beunders (2023) Albadra et al. (2021), Asojo et al. (2022), Luo et al. (2022) 
Co-design   Howard and Somerville (2014) Ghaziani (2021)    Aronoff-Spencer et al. (2022)  Shouman et al. (2022), Somerville and Collins (2008) 
Total0505021002060101110205
Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options