Task-specific ratings of generative AI usefulness across academic tasks (survey, n = 120)
| Academic task | Agree/strongly agree (%) | M | SD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Improving overall academic work efficiency | 100.0 | 4.47 | 0.50 |
| Preparing academic presentations | 56.7 | 3.68 | 1.07 |
| Developing teaching materials | 53.3 | 3.58 | 1.16 |
| Understanding disciplinary content | 51.7 | 3.46 | 1.13 |
| Writing scholarly articles | 48.3 | 3.48 | 1.13 |
| Conducting research activities | 46.7 | 3.48 | 1.08 |
| Writing academic books | 46.7 | 3.35 | 1.19 |
| Academic task | Agree/strongly agree (%) | M | SD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Improving overall academic work efficiency | 100.0 | 4.47 | 0.50 |
| Preparing academic presentations | 56.7 | 3.68 | 1.07 |
| Developing teaching materials | 53.3 | 3.58 | 1.16 |
| Understanding disciplinary content | 51.7 | 3.46 | 1.13 |
| Writing scholarly articles | 48.3 | 3.48 | 1.13 |
| Conducting research activities | 46.7 | 3.48 | 1.08 |
| Writing academic books | 46.7 | 3.35 | 1.19 |
Note(s): The seven task-specific items were analyzed individually and were not combined into a single scale. Cronbach's α = 0.79 applies only to the four-item perceived-usefulness measure described in the Methods
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.