Table 1

Summary of prior research on compassion and key gaps

Area of researchCitationKey findingsResearch gapContribution of the present study
Compassion and employee outcomesChoi et al. (2016) Compassion reduces burnout, deviance, and turnover intentionsCompassion is primarily examined as a predictor, not as a behavior shaped by workplace conditionsPositions compassionate service behavior as an outcome influenced by workplace conditions, specifically customer incivility
Compassion at workHur et al. (2016) Compassion at work enhances performance via identity and creativityLinks to customer-directed compassionate behavior and the role of workplace stressors remain unexaminedExamines how customer incivility and workplace uncertainty shape customer-directed compassionate service behavior
Organizational compassion practicesMcClelland et al. (2018) Compassion practices improve employee well-being and patient outcomesFocus is on positive organizational processes, with limited attention to constraints on compassion or non-healthcare contextsIdentifies workplace uncertainty as a constraint on compassionate service behavior in broader service environments
Compassion and burnoutRopes and de Boer (2021) Compassion is associated with lower burnout among frontline workersAntecedents that constrain or inhibit compassion are not specifiedIntroduces workplace uncertainty as a cognitive mechanism linking customer incivility to reduced compassionate service behavior
Compassion and organizational behaviorZoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara et al. (2023) Compassion drives organization-directed citizenship behaviorCustomer-directed compassionate behavior is largely overlookedExtends compassion research to outward-facing service interactions involving customers
Source(s): The authors created the table shown above

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options