Table 7 Structural model values... | Emerald Publishing

Table 7

Structural model values

Hypothesis	Path	β (original sample)	t-statistic	p-value	f²	Supported?	Interpretation
H1.1	MC → REC	0.124	0.964	0.335	0.010	No	No significant direct effect. MC influences REC indirectly through RESP
H1.2	MC → RESP	0.477	4.548	0.001	0.287	Yes	Strong positive effect. MC associated with RESP consistent with doctrine
H2.1	LMX → MC	0.47	5.308	0.001	0.283	Yes	Strong positive effect. Trust-based relational quality supports the enactment of MC principles
H2.2	LMX → RESP	−0.001	0.007	0.995	0.001	No	No significant direct effect. LMX influence on RESP operates through MC
H2.3	LMX × MC → RESP	0.04	0.584	0.559	0.006	No	No significant moderation effect
H3	VIS → RESP	0.134	1.591	0.112	0.033	No	No significant direct effect
H4	PLAN → RESP	0.348	4.249	0.001	0.207	Yes	Strong positive effect. PLAN enhances RESP
H5	RESP → REC	0.542	4.275	0.001	0.192	Yes	Strong positive effect. RESP is the critical pathway to REC

Hypothesis	Path	β (original sample)	t-statistic	p-value	f²	Supported?	Interpretation
H1.1	MC → REC	0.124	0.964	0.335	0.010	No	No significant direct effect. MC influences REC indirectly through RESP
H1.2	MC → RESP	0.477	4.548	0.001	0.287	Yes	Strong positive effect. MC associated with RESP consistent with doctrine
H2.1	LMX → MC	0.47	5.308	0.001	0.283	Yes	Strong positive effect. Trust-based relational quality supports the enactment of MC principles
H2.2	LMX → RESP	−0.001	0.007	0.995	0.001	No	No significant direct effect. LMX influence on RESP operates through MC
H2.3	LMX × MC → RESP	0.04	0.584	0.559	0.006	No	No significant moderation effect
H3	VIS → RESP	0.134	1.591	0.112	0.033	No	No significant direct effect
H4	PLAN → RESP	0.348	4.249	0.001	0.207	Yes	Strong positive effect. PLAN enhances RESP
H5	RESP → REC	0.542	4.275	0.001	0.192	Yes	Strong positive effect. RESP is the critical pathway to REC