Gender-based heterogeneity in the estimated effect
| Gender | ATT (high vs low DFL) | Std. Error | t-value | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (Male/Reference) | 1.31 | 0.219 | 5.98 | <0.001 |
| 2 (Female) | 1.61 | 0.326 | 4.93 | <0.001 |
| Gender | ATT (high vs low DFL) | Std. Error | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (Male/Reference) | 1.31 | 0.219 | 5.98 | <0.001 |
| 2 (Female) | 1.61 | 0.326 | 4.93 | <0.001 |
Note(s): ATT = Average treatment effect on the treated. Estimates were obtained using stratified propensity score matching (PSM) to compare individuals in the top and bottom tertiles of digital financial literacy (DFL) within gender subgroups. Robust standard errors are reported
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.