Interview guideline
| Phase | Section | Interview questions | No. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information phase | Introduction and background questions | Information about study objectives, procedure, data protection, personal data | |
| Warm-up | Warm-up questions on role, background, understanding of sustainability expertise and relevant sustainability topics | ||
| Main section | I. Identification, development, and distribution of sustainability expertise | How do you identify, acquire, and verify sustainability expertise within the supervisory board? | 1 |
| To what extent do shareholder and employee representatives differ in acquiring or contributing sustainability expertise? | 2 | ||
| Do the two groups emphasise different sustainability content areas? | 3 | ||
| II. Interaction between shareholder and employee representatives | How do you experience the collaboration between the groups – where do synergies or conflicts arise? | 4 | |
| Who carries the greatest weight in discussions about sustainability issues on the supervisory board and why? | 5 | ||
| III. Influence on decision-making within the supervisory board | Have you experienced situations where sustainability expertise within the supervisory board influenced the direction of a discussion or decision? If so, what was it about? | 6 | |
| Which formal structures (e.g. committees, reporting lines) accompany the influence of sustainability expertise – and how effective are they? | 7 | ||
| Are there cases where sustainability expertise was used only symbolically? How do you recognise that? | 8 | ||
| IV. Challenges and barriers | What are the biggest practical challenges (e.g. return pressure, politics) in integrating sustainability expertise into supervisory boards? | 9 | |
| Does the codetermination structure help to anchor sustainability aspects or make the process more difficult? Why? | 10 | ||
| Which regulatory or cultural factors in Germany foster or hinder sustainability competence on supervisory boards? | 11 | ||
| Conclusion | Outlook, reflection and closing | Suggestions for improvement of board practice, future trends, open reflection on additional aspects to consider |
| Phase | Section | Interview questions | No. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information phase | Introduction and background questions | Information about study objectives, procedure, data protection, personal data | |
| Warm-up | Warm-up questions on role, background, understanding of sustainability expertise and relevant sustainability topics | ||
| Main section | I. Identification, development, and distribution of sustainability expertise | How do you identify, acquire, and verify sustainability expertise within the supervisory board? | 1 |
| To what extent do shareholder and employee representatives differ in acquiring or contributing sustainability expertise? | 2 | ||
| Do the two groups emphasise different sustainability content areas? | 3 | ||
| II. Interaction between shareholder and employee representatives | How do you experience the collaboration between the groups – where do synergies or conflicts arise? | 4 | |
| Who carries the greatest weight in discussions about sustainability issues on the supervisory board and why? | 5 | ||
| III. Influence on decision-making within the supervisory board | Have you experienced situations where sustainability expertise within the supervisory board influenced the direction of a discussion or decision? If so, what was it about? | 6 | |
| Which formal structures (e.g. committees, reporting lines) accompany the influence of sustainability expertise – and how effective are they? | 7 | ||
| Are there cases where sustainability expertise was used only symbolically? How do you recognise that? | 8 | ||
| IV. Challenges and barriers | What are the biggest practical challenges (e.g. return pressure, politics) in integrating sustainability expertise into supervisory boards? | 9 | |
| Does the codetermination structure help to anchor sustainability aspects or make the process more difficult? Why? | 10 | ||
| Which regulatory or cultural factors in Germany foster or hinder sustainability competence on supervisory boards? | 11 | ||
| Conclusion | Outlook, reflection and closing | Suggestions for improvement of board practice, future trends, open reflection on additional aspects to consider |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.