Table 5 Condensed thematic structure and...

Table 5

Condensed thematic structure and coding evidence of GHLPM

Theme	Sub-theme	Analytical focus	Stakeholder evidence	Coding strength
Community preparedness literacy	Limited understanding of logistics processes	Low awareness of planning and coordination constraints	Gov, NGO, community	High
	Unrealistic aid expectations	Delays misinterpreted as inefficiency	Gov, NGO	High
	Disaster literacy needs	Improves communication and needs accuracy	Gov, NGO, community	High
Multi-agency coordination capacity	SOP misalignment	Weak interoperability across agencies	Gov, NGO, community	Very high
	Information sharing limitations	Causes duplication and inefficiency	Gov, NGO, community	Very high
	Institutional coordination mechanisms	Enhances synchronisation and response efficiency	Gov, NGO	Medium
GDP-based quality-assured logistics controls	Documentation and traceability	Strengthens accountability systems	Gov, NGO, community	High
	Contextual GDP adaptation	Balances standards and flexibility	Gov, NGO, community	Medium
	Transparency and accountability	Builds trust and legitimacy	Gov, NGO, community	Very high
Cross-organisational training integration	Training fragmentation	Reduces interoperability	Gov, NGO	Medium
	Joint training collaboration	Builds coordination trust	Gov, NGO, community	High
	Training as capability enabler	Enables SOP and GDP implementation	Gov, NGO, community	High
Relief logistics performance outcomes	Multidimensional effectiveness	Beyond speed: equity, responsiveness, transparency	NGO, community	Very high
	Fairness and legitimacy	Trust through equitable distribution	Gov, NGO, community	Very high
	Efficiency–ethics balance	Balancing speed with accountability	Gov, NGO, community	High

Theme	Sub-theme	Analytical focus	Stakeholder evidence	Coding strength
Community preparedness literacy	Limited understanding of logistics processes	Low awareness of planning and coordination constraints	Gov, NGO, community	High
	Unrealistic aid expectations	Delays misinterpreted as inefficiency	Gov, NGO	High
	Disaster literacy needs	Improves communication and needs accuracy	Gov, NGO, community	High
Multi-agency coordination capacity	SOP misalignment	Weak interoperability across agencies	Gov, NGO, community	Very high
	Information sharing limitations	Causes duplication and inefficiency	Gov, NGO, community	Very high
	Institutional coordination mechanisms	Enhances synchronisation and response efficiency	Gov, NGO	Medium
GDP-based quality-assured logistics controls	Documentation and traceability	Strengthens accountability systems	Gov, NGO, community	High
	Contextual GDP adaptation	Balances standards and flexibility	Gov, NGO, community	Medium
	Transparency and accountability	Builds trust and legitimacy	Gov, NGO, community	Very high
Cross-organisational training integration	Training fragmentation	Reduces interoperability	Gov, NGO	Medium
	Joint training collaboration	Builds coordination trust	Gov, NGO, community	High
	Training as capability enabler	Enables SOP and GDP implementation	Gov, NGO, community	High
Relief logistics performance outcomes	Multidimensional effectiveness	Beyond speed: equity, responsiveness, transparency	NGO, community	Very high
	Fairness and legitimacy	Trust through equitable distribution	Gov, NGO, community	Very high
	Efficiency–ethics balance	Balancing speed with accountability	Gov, NGO, community	High

Note(s):

Coding strength reflects relative thematic prominence based on the recurrence and consistency of references across FGDs and stakeholder groups during thematic analysis; it is not a statistical frequency measure

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable