Comparison of the scope, method, and main contribution of recent reviews of AI-related trading research (Horobet et al., 2024; Bhuiyan et al., 2025; Chen et al., 2025) and the gap addressed by the present study
| Study | Type | Scope | Main contribution | Gap addressed by this study |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horobet et al. (2024) | Bibliometric | Algorithmic trading | Evolution of algorithmic trading literature | Does not focus specifically on AI |
| Bhuiyan et al. (2025) | Systematic review | Deep learning in algorithmic trading | Predictive DL models | Limited to deep learning |
| Chen et al. (2025) | Bibliometric | Sentiment analysis in finance | AI-based sentiment research | Limited thematic scope |
| This study | Bibliometric | AI in algorithmic trading | Integrated mapping of publications, citations, collaboration and themes (1993–2025) | Comprehensive interdisciplinary perspective |
| Study | Type | Scope | Main contribution | Gap addressed by this study |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bibliometric | Algorithmic trading | Evolution of algorithmic trading literature | Does not focus specifically on AI | |
| Systematic review | Deep learning in algorithmic trading | Predictive DL models | Limited to deep learning | |
| Bibliometric | Sentiment analysis in finance | AI-based sentiment research | Limited thematic scope | |
| This study | Bibliometric | AI in algorithmic trading | Integrated mapping of publications, citations, collaboration and themes (1993–2025) | Comprehensive interdisciplinary perspective |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.