Ordinal logistic regression model for wine consumer satisfaction
| Predictors | Estimation | 95% CI | SE | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant 1 | 4.493 | 2.863–6.124 | 0.832 | <0.001 |
| Constant 2 | 6.976 | 5.295–8.657 | 0.858 | <0.001 |
| Constant 3 | 9.169 | 7.391–10.948 | 0.907 | <0.001 |
| Constant 4 | 11.127 | 9.248–13.007 | 0.959 | <0.001 |
| Gender (M) | 0.704 | 0.310–1.098 | 0.201 | <0.001 |
| Age | 0.010 | −0.009–0.029 | 0.010 | 0.290 |
| Educational status | 0.220 | −0.050–0.489 | 0.138 | 0.111 |
| Income | −0.007 | −0.147–0.133 | 0.071 | 0.927 |
| Brand | 0.641 | 0.381–0.900 | 0.132 | <0.001 |
| Price choice | 0.310 | 0.069–0.552 | 0.123 | 0.012 |
| Production place | 0.311 | 0.055–0.566 | 0.131 | 0.017 |
| Wine vintage | 0.358 | 0.120–0.596 | 0.121 | 0.003 |
| Certification | 0.379 | 0.124–0.633 | 0.130 | 0.004 |
| Additives | 0.089 | −0.114–0.292 | 0.104 | 0.390 |
| Predictors | Estimation | 95% CI | SE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant 1 | 4.493 | 2.863–6.124 | 0.832 | <0.001 |
| Constant 2 | 6.976 | 5.295–8.657 | 0.858 | <0.001 |
| Constant 3 | 9.169 | 7.391–10.948 | 0.907 | <0.001 |
| Constant 4 | 11.127 | 9.248–13.007 | 0.959 | <0.001 |
| Gender (M) | 0.704 | 0.310–1.098 | 0.201 | |
| Age | 0.010 | −0.009–0.029 | 0.010 | 0.290 |
| Educational status | 0.220 | −0.050–0.489 | 0.138 | 0.111 |
| Income | −0.007 | −0.147–0.133 | 0.071 | 0.927 |
| Brand | 0.641 | 0.381–0.900 | 0.132 | |
| Price choice | 0.310 | 0.069–0.552 | 0.123 | |
| Production place | 0.311 | 0.055–0.566 | 0.131 | |
| Wine vintage | 0.358 | 0.120–0.596 | 0.121 | |
| Certification | 0.379 | 0.124–0.633 | 0.130 | |
| Additives | 0.089 | −0.114–0.292 | 0.104 | 0.390 |
Notes: Log-Likelihood = 875.584; full model p-value<0.001; deviance test: p = 0.978; pseudo R2: Cox Snell = 0.407; Nagelkarke = 0.431; Mc Fadden = 0.172
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.