Ordinal logistic regression model for satisfaction of biological wine consumption
| Predictors | Estimation | 95% CI | SE | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant 1 | 1.867 | 0.306–3.429 | 0.797 | 0.019 |
| Constant 2 | 4.738 | 3.117–6.358 | 0.827 | <0.001 |
| Constant 3 | 6.684 | 4.988–8.379 | 0.865 | <0.001 |
| Constant 4 | 8.718 | 6.945–10.491 | 0.905 | <0.001 |
| Gender (M) | −0.352 | −0.748–0.044 | 0.202 | 0.081 |
| Age | −0.008 | −0.027–0.011 | 0.010 | 0.417 |
| Educational status | −0.144 | −0.415–0.127 | 0.138 | 0.299 |
| Income | 0.130 | 0.010–0.258 | 0.066 | 0.042 |
| Brand | 0.045 | −0.210–0.300 | 0.130 | 0.730 |
| Price choice | 0.060 | −0.182–0.302 | 0.124 | 0.626 |
| Production place | 0.139 | −0.118–0.397 | 0.131 | 0.289 |
| Wine vintage | 0.022 | −0.215–0.260 | 0.121 | 0.855 |
| Certification | 0.427 | 0.170–0.684 | 0.131 | 0.001 |
| Additives | 1.414 | 1.163–1.665 | 0.128 | <0.001 |
| Predictors | Estimation | 95% CI | SE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant 1 | 1.867 | 0.306–3.429 | 0.797 | 0.019 |
| Constant 2 | 4.738 | 3.117–6.358 | 0.827 | <0.001 |
| Constant 3 | 6.684 | 4.988–8.379 | 0.865 | <0.001 |
| Constant 4 | 8.718 | 6.945–10.491 | 0.905 | <0.001 |
| Gender (M) | −0.352 | −0.748–0.044 | 0.202 | 0.081 |
| Age | −0.008 | −0.027–0.011 | 0.010 | 0.417 |
| Educational status | −0.144 | −0.415–0.127 | 0.138 | 0.299 |
| Income | 0.130 | 0.010–0.258 | 0.066 | |
| Brand | 0.045 | −0.210–0.300 | 0.130 | 0.730 |
| Price choice | 0.060 | −0.182–0.302 | 0.124 | 0.626 |
| Production place | 0.139 | −0.118–0.397 | 0.131 | 0.289 |
| Wine vintage | 0.022 | −0.215–0.260 | 0.121 | 0.855 |
| Certification | 0.427 | 0.170–0.684 | 0.131 | |
| Additives | 1.414 | 1.163–1.665 | 0.128 |
Notes: Log-Likelihood = 837.616; full model p-value<0.001; deviance test: p = 0.989; pseudo R2: Cox Snell = 0.545; Nagelkarke = 0.571; Mc Fadden = 0.256
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.