Table 3

Structural model results

PathDirect Effect95% BCa CIIndirect effect95% BCa CITotal effect95% BCa CI
Perceived co-worker support → Horizontal knowledge withholding−0.216 p = 0.210[−0.496; 0.177]Nsig    
Perceived co-worker support → Voluntary turnover intention−0.027 p = 0.738[−0.186; 0.124]Nsig    
Perceived co-worker support → Affective organizational commitment0.390 p = 0.000[0.190; 0.551]Sig    
Affective organizational commitment → Voluntary turnover intention−0.642 p = 0.000[−0.762; −0.474]Sig    
Affective organizational commitment → Horizontal knowledge withholding−0.111 p = 0.467[−0.388; 0.183]Nsig    
Perceived co-worker support → Affective organizational commitment → Voluntary turnover intention−0.027 p = 0.738[−0.186; 0.124] Nsig−0.250 p = 0.000[−0.384; −0.125] Sig−0.277 p = 0.002[−0.436; −0.082] Sig
Perceived co-worker support → Affective organizational commitment → Horizontal knowledge withholding−0.216 p = 0.210[−0.496; 0.177]Nsig−0.043 p = 0.474[−0.159; 0.077]Nsig−0.259 p = 0.069[−0.515; 0.045] NSig

Note(s): BCa CI = bias corrected confidence interval; Sig. = a significant direct effect at 0.05; Nsig. = a non-significant direct effect at 0.05. Bootstrapping based on n = 5,000 subsamples

[ViewLarge]
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal