Table 1

Prior literature on ESG and performance in banking sector

ESG variablesAnalyzed dimensionsReferencesEffects on performance
EnvironmentalISO 14001 certifications are related with a positive market reactionJacobs et al. (2010) Positive
 Environmental philanthropy is considered positively by the marketJacobs et al. (2010) Positive
 Depositors prefer a bank’s environment and heritage activitiesCallado-Munoz and Utreto-González (2011) Positive
 Eco-certification of buildings is related with increased retail revenuesChang and Devine (2019) Positive
 Banks engaged in environmental protection are also less riskyGangi et al. (2019) Positive
 Environmental financing positively impacts the bank’s ROENizam et al. (2019) Positive
 Environmental performance positively affects bank’s ROE and ROAShakil et al. (2019) Positive
 Share price reaction to Equator Principles adoption is insignificantFinger et al. (2018) Insignificant
 Environmental costs adversely influence a firm’s financial performanceJo et al. (2015) Negative
 Eco-certification of buildings is associated with increased retail revenuesChang and Devine (2019) Negative
SocialA sustainability report has a positive influence on the bank’s stock priceCarnevale and Mazzuca (2014) Positive
 A bank’s degree of engagement in CSR activities is positively related to ROA and ROEShen et al. (2016), Wu et al. (2017)Positive
 Employee relations are positively related to ROAEsteban-Sanchez et al. (2017) Positive
 Inclusion in a sustainability index is positively associated with ROA before the financial crisisForcadell and Aracil (2017) Positive
 The product responsibility dimension acts as a significant factor in reducing company crash riskUtz (2019) Positive
 Access-to-finance for SMEs has a positive impact on ROENizam et al. (2019) Positive
 CSR disclosure is positively related to ROA and ROE for banks in AfricaSiueia et al. (2019) Positive
 Product responsibility is a negative predictor of ROA and ROEEsteban-Sanchez et al. (2017) Negative
 Community involvement was a negative predictor of ROA during the financial crisisEsteban-Sanchez et al. (2017) Negative
Governance   
 Stronger corporate governance was associated with higher profitability (ROA) during the financial crisisPeni and Vähämaa (2012) Positive
 Financial institutions with better governance mechanisms has a higher Tobin’s QZagorchev and Gao (2015) Positive
 Banks with better corporate governanceEsteban-Sanchez et al. (2017) Positive
 Corporate governance index had a positive effect on average monthly stock returns during the financial crisisAnginer et al. (2018) Positive
 Corporate governance index has a nonsignificant effect on the bank’s stock returns during the crisisAebi et al. (2012) Insignificant
 Bank governance reform has a nonsignificant effect on ROA and ROEMaxfield et al. (2018) Insignificant
 Governance quality has an insignificant effect on a bank’s profitability (ROA and ROE)Shakil et al. (2019) Insignificant
 Corporate governance index has a nonsignificant effect on ROAHarkin et al. (2020) Insignificant
 The relationship between the board composition index and stock returns was negative during the financial crisisBeltratti and Stulz (2012) Negative
 Banks with stronger corporate governance were associated with a lower Tobin’s Q and stock returns during the financial crisisPeni and Vähämaa (2012) Negative
 Inclusion in a sustainability index is negatively associated with ROAForcadell and Aracil (2017)Negative

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal