Table 1.

Summary of the case studies. Authors elaboration

Case StudiesIndustry informationCompany strategy and positioningOrganization and structure of CI practicesContribution of CI to strategy
Case A
Diagnostic imagining center
Healthcare industry diagnostic imaging
High complexity
and dispersion
Increasing technology sophistication
Increased longevity of Brazilian population
Stressed supply chain (upstream and downstream)
Main players, namely, Alliar, Dasa, Fleury
Differentiation
Quality service and innovation
Doing thing differently
MI unit
Dedicate Personal according to strategic level
Highly coordinated
Data sharing and real time monitoring
Four software running the whole business (ERP, CRM, Call Center, Software for executing exams)
Operational/tactical/strategical level
Supporting the strategic planning and commercial units
Supporting every step of the strategic formulation process (from defining strategic objectives to monitoring)
Understanding the industry
Monitoring competitors
Spotting opportunities
Supporting sale negotiations
Monitoring strategy performance
Case B
Top player
commerce marketing company
Retargeting industry
Fast changing and highly competitive
Disruptive technologies
Evolution of
Customer behavior
Main players, namely, Adobe, AdRoll, Alibaba, Amazon, Criteo, Facebook, Google, Oracle
Differentiation
High performance
Sophisticated machine learning technology
Strong partnership with publisher
Will of advertiser to work jointly
CI local unit
Weak coordination and support by the headquarter
Users of clients’ website main data asset
Local tactical level
Support to the local Commercial unit
Objectives defined globally and dictated with a top-down approach
Support to tactical strategy definition, implementation and monitoring
Routine analysis of user data to define margin projections
Sporadic market analysis requested by the clients and/or marketing department
Case C
Top player private bank
Private banking
Stable environment
Slow changing
Protected top players dominating
New entrants or small players not perceived as threats
Main players, namely, Bradesco, Itaú and Santander
Individual and
Business banking
Differentiation
Quality service
High interest rate
Evolution of the commercial planning area
Departmentalized
according to the client segment
Client data value asset
No data sharing
High level of
overlap
Duplication cost
Tactical/operational level
Support to the commercial unit
Support to tactical strategy implementation and monitoring
Analysis of production
follow-ups (balances, flows, new accounts)
Analysis of financial results
(agencies of the segment)
Service improvement and customization
Monitoring the loss of clients to the competitors
Case D
Small disruptive
private bank
Private banking
Protected top players dominating
Technologies are perceived as highly disruptive and able to modify the environment, threating the incumbents
Total digital
Innovative solutions
Low interest rate/setup fee
Important segment of agribusiness
CRM unit
Departmentalized
according to the client segment
Highly coordinated
Strategic/tactical level
Support to various areas
Client acquisition/retention
Monitoring competitors
in the segment
Verifying financial regulation
Campaign to launch new product

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options