Measurement scales and items
| Measure | Items | FLA2 | FLB2 | FLC2 | FL3 | Scale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Co-op ostracism1, 2, 3 | To what extent others at the co-op… | 7-point scale | ||||
| show no interest for you | 0.94 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.77 | (1 = “not at all”, 7 = “to a large extent”) | |
| do not respond to you or your messages | 0.91 | 0.80 | 0.93 | 0.80 | ||
| avoid you | 0.90 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.76 | ||
| show little interest in your opinion | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.85 | ||
| disregard your interests | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 0.85 | ||
| ignore you | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.84 | ||
| your voice is not heard | 0.93 | 0.78 | 0.90 | 0.86 | ||
| keep information from you | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.75 | ||
| do not pay attention to you | 0.94 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.80 | ||
| Social undermining2 (Duffy et al., 2002) | “Others at the co-op…” | 7-point scale | ||||
| belittle you or your ideas | 0.79 | 0.92 | 0.73 | – | (1 = “not at all”, 7 = “to a large extent”) | |
| compete with you for status and recognition | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.85 | – | ||
| criticise the way you handle things in a way that is not helpful | 0.80 | 0.95 | 0.90 | – | ||
| insult you | 0.76 | 0.87 | 0.81 | – | ||
| Trust2 (Morgan and Hunt, 1994) | “Others at the co-op…” | 7-point scale | ||||
| can generally be trusted | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.75 | – | (1 = “strongly disagree”, 7 = “strongly agree”) | |
| can be counted on to do what is right | 0.58 | 0.67 | 0.51 | – | ||
| have high integrity | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.62 | – | ||
| can be relied on | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.76 | – | ||
| WOM2 (Choi and Choi, 2014) | I usually say positive things about my co-op to other people | 0.84 | 0.91 | 0.75 | – | 7-point scale |
| I tell other people to consider my co-op for membership | 0.78 | 0.91 | 0.82 | – | (1 = “strongly disagree”, 7 = “strongly agree”) | |
| I recommend my co-op and its products/services to others | 0.90 | 0.96 | 0.89 | – | ||
| Withdrawal intentions2, 3 (Jensen et al., 2013) | I often think of quitting my membership at the co-op | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.68 | 7-point scale |
| If that were possible, I would look for a better co-op | 0.81 | 0.95 | 0.91 | 0.85 | (1 = “strongly disagree”, 7 = “strongly agree”) | |
| There isn’t much to be gained by staying in the co-op | 0.79 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.86 | ||
| Entitativity3 (Vock et al., 2013) | “At my co-op, we…” | 7-point scale | ||||
| form an entity | – | – | – | 0.86 | (1 = “strongly disagree”, 7 = “strongly agree”) | |
| have a bond | – | – | – | 0.85 | ||
| are a unity | – | – | – | 0.85 | ||
| Cognitive capital3 (Villenaa et al., 2011) | share similar corporate culture/values | – | – | – | 0.69 | 7-point scale |
| share similar philosophies/approaches to business dealings | – | – | – | 0.87 | (1 = “strongly disagree”, 7 = “strongly agree”) | |
| have compatible goals and objectives | – | – | – | 0.85 | ||
| Customer-company identification3 (Homburg et al., 2009) | I strongly identify with this co-op | – | – | – | 0.74 | 7-point scale |
| I feel good to be a member-customer of this co-op | – | – | – | 0.79 | (1 = “strongly disagree”, 7 = “strongly agree”) | |
| I like to tell that I am a member-customer of this co-op | – | – | – | 0.77 | ||
| This co-op fits well to me | – | – | – | 0.78 |
| Measure | Items | FLA2 | FLB2 | FLC2 | FL3 | Scale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Co-op ostracism1, 2, 3 | 7-point scale | |||||
| show no interest for you | 0.94 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.77 | (1 = “not at all”, 7 = “to a large extent”) | |
| do not respond to you or your messages | 0.91 | 0.80 | 0.93 | 0.80 | ||
| avoid you | 0.90 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.76 | ||
| show little interest in your opinion | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.85 | ||
| disregard your interests | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 0.85 | ||
| ignore you | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.84 | ||
| your voice is not heard | 0.93 | 0.78 | 0.90 | 0.86 | ||
| keep information from you | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.75 | ||
| do not pay attention to you | 0.94 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.80 | ||
| Social undermining2 ( | 7-point scale | |||||
| belittle you or your ideas | 0.79 | 0.92 | 0.73 | – | (1 = “not at all”, 7 = “to a large extent”) | |
| compete with you for status and recognition | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.85 | – | ||
| criticise the way you handle things in a way that is not helpful | 0.80 | 0.95 | 0.90 | – | ||
| insult you | 0.76 | 0.87 | 0.81 | – | ||
| Trust2 ( | 7-point scale | |||||
| can generally be trusted | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.75 | – | (1 = “strongly disagree”, 7 = “strongly agree”) | |
| can be counted on to do what is right | 0.58 | 0.67 | 0.51 | – | ||
| have high integrity | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.62 | – | ||
| can be relied on | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.76 | – | ||
| WOM2 ( | I usually say positive things about my co-op to other people | 0.84 | 0.91 | 0.75 | – | 7-point scale |
| I tell other people to consider my co-op for membership | 0.78 | 0.91 | 0.82 | – | (1 = “strongly disagree”, 7 = “strongly agree”) | |
| I recommend my co-op and its products/services to others | 0.90 | 0.96 | 0.89 | – | ||
| Withdrawal intentions2, 3 ( | I often think of quitting my membership at the co-op | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.68 | 7-point scale |
| If that were possible, I would look for a better co-op | 0.81 | 0.95 | 0.91 | 0.85 | (1 = “strongly disagree”, 7 = “strongly agree”) | |
| There isn’t much to be gained by staying in the co-op | 0.79 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.86 | ||
| Entitativity3 ( | 7-point scale | |||||
| form an entity | – | – | – | 0.86 | (1 = “strongly disagree”, 7 = “strongly agree”) | |
| have a bond | – | – | – | 0.85 | ||
| are a unity | – | – | – | 0.85 | ||
| Cognitive capital3 ( | share similar corporate culture/values | – | – | – | 0.69 | 7-point scale |
| share similar philosophies/approaches to business dealings | – | – | – | 0.87 | (1 = “strongly disagree”, 7 = “strongly agree”) | |
| have compatible goals and objectives | – | – | – | 0.85 | ||
| Customer-company identification3 ( | I strongly identify with this co-op | – | – | – | 0.74 | 7-point scale |
| I feel good to be a member-customer of this co-op | – | – | – | 0.79 | (1 = “strongly disagree”, 7 = “strongly agree”) | |
| I like to tell that I am a member-customer of this co-op | – | – | – | 0.77 | ||
| This co-op fits well to me | – | – | – | 0.78 |
Notes:
Subscripts indicate the corresponding sample in Study 2 (A = sample A, B = sample B, and C = sample C); superscripts indicate the study in which each measure was used (1 = Study 1, 2 = Study 2, and 3 = Study 3); FL = factor loading; all factor loadings were highly significant (p < 0.001); the three potential sources of ostracism (i.e. employees, other members, members of the BoD) were given as examples for “others”
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.