Table IV.

Results of model comparison

Model 1:
TAM/IDT model
Model 2:
TAM/IDT model incl. PRT
BtR2BtR2
PU → BI (H1a)0.37*5.570.640.39*5.590.65
PEOU → BI (H1b)−0.04−0.73 −0.08−1.29 
CO → BI (H3a)0.46*7.17 0.39*5.58 
TRIa → BI (H3b)0.010.34 0.020.58 
RD → BI (H3c)0.010.09 0.010.09 
VIa → BI (H3d)0.040.82 0.040.89 
PRO → BI (H7a)   0.020.18 
PRS → BI   −0.16*−1.78 
PRP → BI   0.10*1.70 
PRT → BI   −0.07−1.10 
Control variables      
TAF → BI0.11*2.14 0.09*1.79 
Income → BI−0.02−0.59 −0.03−0.82 
Age → BI0.040.97 0.040.94 
PEOU → PU (H2)0.13*2.300.510.081.290.56
CO → PU (H4a)0.70*10.35 0.68*10.33 
TRIa → PU (H4b)−0.03−0.59 −0.02−0.36 
RD → PU (H4c)−0.14*−2.01 −0.14*−2.28 
VIa → PU (H4d)0.040.68 0.040.72 
PRO → PU (H7b)   −0.17*−1.76 
PRS → PU   0.33*3.38 
PRP → PU   −0.10*−1.69 
PRT → PU   −0.11−1.50 
CO → PEOU (H5a)0.30*5.490.360.13*2.280.47
TRIa → PEOU (H5b)−0.04−0.74 −0.01−0.09 
RD → PEOU (H5c)0.45*5.16 0.33*4.64 
VIa → PEOU (H5d)−0.070.94 −0.04−0.58 
PRO → PEOU (H7c)   0.23*2.14 
PRS → PEOU   −0.28*−2.75 
PRP → PEOU   0.030.39 
PRT → PEOU   −0.47*−5.75 
PRS → PRO (H6a)   0.63*10.550.66
PRP → PRO (H6b)   0.19*2.96 
PRT → PRO (H6c)   0.11*2.01 
CFI0.940.93
TLI0.920.92
Chi2611.661109.19
RMSEA0.060.05
SRMR0.070.07

Notes:

*=p < 0.05;

a

due to the high correlation between trialibility (TRI) and visibility (VI), the two predictors have been tested in separate models

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options