Table V. Direct, indirect and total... | Emerald Publishing

Table V.

Direct, indirect and total effects

	Behavioral intention				Perceived usefulness				Perceived ease of use
	Direct	Indirect	Total	rel. Imp.	Direct	Indirect	Total	rel. Imp.	Direct	Indirect	Total	rel. Imp.
PU	0.39*	–	0.39*
PEOU	−0.08	0.03	−0.05	38	0.08	–	0.08
CO	0.39*	0.36*	0.65*	36	0.68*	0.01	0.69*	1	0.13*	–	0.13*	–
RD	0.01	−0.07*	−0.07	50	−0.14*	0.03	−0.11*	21	0.33*	–	0.33*	–
TRI	0.02	−0.01	0.02	33	−0.02	−0.00	−0.02	0	−0.00	–	−0.00	–
CVI	0.04	0.02	0.06	25	0.04	−0.01	0.04	20	−0.04	–	−0.04	–
PRO	0.02	−0.08*	−0.06	57	−0.17*	0.02	−0.15	12	0.23*	–	0.23*	–
PRS	−0.16*	0.1	−0.06	63	0.33*	−0.12*	0.21*	36	−0.28*	0.14*	−0.13*	52
PRP	0.10*	−0.05*	0.04	56	−0.1*	−0.03	−0.13*	19	0.03	0.04*	0.07	36
PRT	−0.07	−0.03	−0.10*	23	−0.11	−0.06	−0.16*	27	−0.47*	0.03	−0.44*	6

	Behavioral intention				Perceived usefulness				Perceived ease of use
	Direct	Indirect	Total	rel. Imp.	Direct	Indirect	Total	rel. Imp.	Direct	Indirect	Total	rel. Imp.
PU	0.39*	–	0.39*
PEOU	−0.08	0.03	−0.05	38	0.08	–	0.08
CO	0.39*	0.36*	0.65*	36	0.68*	0.01	0.69*	1	0.13*	–	0.13*	–
RD	0.01	−0.07*	−0.07	50	−0.14*	0.03	−0.11*	21	0.33*	–	0.33*	–
TRI	0.02	−0.01	0.02	33	−0.02	−0.00	−0.02	0	−0.00	–	−0.00	–
CVI	0.04	0.02	0.06	25	0.04	−0.01	0.04	20	−0.04	–	−0.04	–
PRO	0.02	−0.08*	−0.06	57	−0.17*	0.02	−0.15	12	0.23*	–	0.23*	–
PRS	−0.16*	0.1	−0.06	63	0.33*	−0.12*	0.21*	36	−0.28*	0.14*	−0.13*	52
PRP	0.10*	−0.05*	0.04	56	−0.1*	−0.03	−0.13*	19	0.03	0.04*	0.07	36
PRT	−0.07	−0.03	−0.10*	23	−0.11	−0.06	−0.16*	27	−0.47*	0.03	−0.44*	6

Notes:

We calculated the mediation effect using the Alwin and Hauser’s (1975) formula of the relative importance: |indirect effect|/(|indirect effect|+|total effect|)