Table 1.

Contribution to the extant literature

CriteriaPhillips et al. (2015) Bhardwaj (2001) Joseph (2001) Mishra and Prasad (2004) Lal (1986) Weinberg (1975) This study
Sales force price delegationYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Segment-level discriminatory pricingYes
Optimization of customer priceYesYesYes
Optimization of agent incentiveAccounted for but not optimizedAccounted for but not optimizedAccounted for but not optimizedAccounted for but not optimizedYes
Type of sales forceExternalInternalInternalInternalInternalInternalExternal
CompetitionYesYes
Firm’s utility/decisionYesYesYesYesYes
Sales force’s utility/decisionYesYesYesYesYes
Customer’s utility/decisionYesYesYes
Endogeneity of priceYesYes
Modeling approachEmpirical (field data)AnalyticalAnalyticalAnalyticalAnalyticalAnalyticalEmpirical (field data)
Model typeProbit modelGame theoretic model between two competing firmsOptimization of firm profit and salesperson utilityOptimization of firm profit and salesperson utilityOptimization of firm profit and salesperson utilityOptimization of firm profit and salesperson utilityThree-stage logit model
Research questionHow much (if any) price discretion should headquarters grant salespeople?What is the impact of competition on the delegation decision and how does delegation impact prices and incentives?When is it optimal to delegate pricing authority to sales force?Can the role of asymmetric information between agents and principals be mitigated through contracting?What are the conditions under which the sales manager may allow the salesperson to set product prices?Under what compensation system is it appropriate for a salesman to have control over price?What are the profit implications of analytics-driven segment-level pricing compared with sales force price delegation?
Source: Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal