Indoor air parameters associated with health outcomes in schools
| Feature | Health outcomes | Target value/guidelines |
|---|---|---|
| Ventilation rate | Increased ventilation rates were associated with decreased illness absence (Mendell et al., 2013) | According to EN 16798–1 (European Committee for Standardization, 2019), the total ventilation rate must never be lower than 4 l/s per person. The Finnish standard specifies the minimum ventilation rate per person 6 l/s in schools (Finnish Ministry of The Environment, 2017) |
| Higher ventilation rates, even up to 15 l/s per person or higher, in classrooms were consistently associated with decreased illness absence (Mendell et al., 2013) | ||
| A small increase in reported eye symptoms at the higher ventilation rates were found but no association with other self-reported symptoms (Petersen et al., 2016) | ||
| Increased ventilation rate was significantly associated with decreased odds of suffering from eye and skin disorders (Baloch et al., 2020) | ||
| CO2 | A CO2 concentration above 1,000 ppm in classrooms was associated with considerable increases in dry cough and rhinitis (Simoni et al., 2010) | A European standard specifies the maximum CO2 concentration in a classroom with moderate indoor air quality of 600–1000 ppm (CEN European Committee for Standardization, 2004). According to a Finnish standard (Finnish Ministry of The Environment, 2017), the maximum CO2 concentration in a new building is 800 ppm above the level of CO2 outdoors |
| CO2 concentration was negatively correlated with general symptoms and mucosal symptoms (Zhang et al., 2011) | ||
| Higher level of CO2 was associated with itchiness and nasal congestion (Fernández-Agüera et al., 2019) | ||
| Allergies, nose irritation and fatigue were significantly positively correlated to the levels of CO2 concentrations (Dorizas et al., 2015) | ||
| Ocular, nasal and throat symptoms, breathlessness, headache and tiredness were significantly more common at higher CO2 levels (Norbäck and Nordström, 2008) | ||
| Increased classroom CO2 had a relatively small, but significant, effect on wheezing but not on other health problems, e.g. headaches (Kim et al., 2011) | ||
| Current asthma, asthma attacks and asthma medication were positively associated with CO2 (Mi et al., 2006) | ||
| Teachers’ neuro-physiologic (i.e. headache, fatigue, difficulty concentrating) symptoms significantly increased for every 100 ppm increase in maximum classroom CO2 concentrations and were nonsignificantly increased in classrooms with above-median proportions of CO2 concentrations greater than 1,000 ppm (Muscatiello et al., 2015) | ||
| Higher level of CO2 was associated with an increased incidence of mucosal symptoms and general symptoms (Zhang et al., 2014) | ||
| CO2 values higher than 2,100 ppm were associated with exercise-induced wheezing and night cough among pupils (Fraga et al., 2008) | ||
| Higher levels of CO2 in schools were connected with a higher risk of experiencing upper, lower airways and systemic outcomes (Baloch et al., 2020) | ||
| Air pressure | Positive air pressure (5–7 Pa) decreased nose irritation, dryness of facial skin and tiredness in a school, where occupants’ symptoms were suspected to be related to the impurities leaked indoors through the building envelope (Vornanen-Winqvist et al., 2018a, 2018b) | According to the National Building Code of Finland, in a new building, positive air pressure should not cause long-term moisture load into the structures and negative air pressure should not allow harmful contaminant to enter into indoor air (Finnish Ministry of The Environment, 2017) |
| Air humidity | Modest increase in respiratory symptoms over both at low (<30%) and high RH (>50%) among teachers (Angelon-Gaetz et al., 2016) | |
| Current asthma, asthma attacks and asthma medication were positively associated with indoor relative air humidity (Mi et al., 2006) | ||
| Relative humidity was associated with increased odds of suffering from lower airways and systemic disorders among schoolchildren (Baloch et al., 2020) | ||
| Room temperature | Increased room temperature was related to nasal and throat symptoms, headache and tiredness (Norbäck and Nordström, 2008) | In Finland, target value for room temperature is 20°C– 23°C during heating season (Finnish Ministry of the Environment, 2012) |
| Room temperatures above 22 °C increased mucosal irritation and general symptoms such as headache and tiredness may occur in temperate climates (Zhang et al., 2011) | ||
| NO2 | An increase in indoor NO2 was associated with current asthma and asthma medication. Outdoor NO2 was associated with current asthma (Mi et al., 2006) | The WHO guideline value is 200 μg/m3 for 1-h NO2 concentration (World Health Organization, 2010) |
| NO2 might be related to mucosal symptoms, and skin symptoms (Zhang et al., 2011) | ||
| Pupils reported more wheezing at increased outdoor level of NO2 (Kim et al., 2011) | ||
| SO2 | SO2 might be related to general symptoms, mucosal symptoms and skin symptoms (Zhang et al., 2011) | The 24-h average WHO guideline value for SO2 is 20 μg/m3 (World Health Organization, 2006) |
| Both indoor and outdoor SO2 were positively associated with prevalence of school-related symptoms (Zhang et al., 2014) | ||
| O3 | Indoor O3 was positively associated with prevalence of skin symptoms (Zhang et al., 2014) | The daily maximum 8-h mean of WHO guideline value for O3 is 100 μg/m3 (World Health Organization, 2006) |
| Elevated levels of ozone were significantly related to a variety of symptoms (Baloch et al., 2020) | ||
| VOC | Pupils exposed to higher total VOC concentrations (the median concentration of 140.3 μg/m3) had a twofold increased risk of having asthma-related symptoms (Madureira et al., 2015) | WHO recommendation is 100 µg/m3 (30 min) (World Health Organization, 2010). Finnish standard recommends the action level of 400 µg/m3 (Valvira, 2016) |
| Increased number of VOCs was connected to a higher risk for upper and lower airways and systemic disorders (Baloch et al., 2020) | ||
| Formaldehyde | Indoor exposure to formaldehyde was related to asthma-like symptoms among pupils (Madureira et al., 2015) | WHO and Finnish standard specify the maximum short-term (30 min) guideline of 0.1 mg/m3 (Finnish Ministry of the Environment, 2012; World Health Organization, 2010) |
| A high prevalence of rhinoconjunctivitis in the past year was found in children using classrooms with high levels of formaldehyde (Annesi-Maesano et al., 2012) | ||
| Particulate matters (PM2.5 and PM10): contaminants, including viruses, bacteria, allergens, fungi and traffic emissions | Both indoor and outdoor PM10 was associated with increased incidence and decreased remission of most types of SBS symptoms such as facial and hand rash or itching; eye irritation; nasal catarrh and obstruction; dryness in the throat; sore throat; irritating cough; headache (Zhang et al., 2014) | The WHO health based standard for PM10 is a maximum of 50 µg/m3 as a 24-h mean value (World Health Organization, 2006). According to the Finnish standard, the maximum design value is also 50 µg/m3 for PM10 and 25 µg/m3 for PM2,5 (Finnish Ministry of the Environment, 2012) |
| The indoor median concentration of PM2.5 and PM10 that exceed the 25 μg/m3 and 50 μg/m3 levels of WHO air quality guidelines for a sampling period of 24 h increased the odds of asthma-like symptoms among pupils (Madureira et al., 2015) | ||
| High fungal concentrations were associated with respiratory symptoms of children in concrete/brick schools but not in wooden schools (Meklin et al., 2002) | ||
| Certain moulds were associated with the respiratory symptoms of children (Simoni et al., 2011) |
| Feature | Health outcomes | Target value/guidelines |
|---|---|---|
| Ventilation rate | Increased ventilation rates were associated with decreased illness absence (Mendell | According to EN 16798–1 ( |
| Higher ventilation rates, even up to 15 l/s per person or higher, in classrooms were consistently associated with decreased illness absence (Mendell | ||
| A small increase in reported eye symptoms at the higher ventilation rates were found but no association with other self-reported symptoms (Petersen | ||
| Increased ventilation rate was significantly associated with decreased odds of suffering from eye and skin disorders (Baloch | ||
| CO2 | A CO2 concentration above 1,000 ppm in classrooms was associated with considerable increases in dry cough and rhinitis (Simoni | A European standard specifies the maximum CO2 concentration in a classroom with moderate indoor air quality of 600–1000 ppm ( |
| CO2 concentration was negatively correlated with general symptoms and mucosal symptoms (Zhang | ||
| Higher level of CO2 was associated with itchiness and nasal congestion (Fernández-Agüera | ||
| Allergies, nose irritation and fatigue were significantly positively correlated to the levels of CO2 concentrations (Dorizas | ||
| Ocular, nasal and throat symptoms, breathlessness, headache and tiredness were significantly more common at higher CO2 levels ( | ||
| Increased classroom CO2 had a relatively small, but significant, effect on wheezing but not on other health problems, e.g. headaches (Kim | ||
| Current asthma, asthma attacks and asthma medication were positively associated with CO2 (Mi | ||
| Teachers’ neuro-physiologic (i.e. headache, fatigue, difficulty concentrating) symptoms significantly increased for every 100 ppm increase in maximum classroom CO2 concentrations and were nonsignificantly increased in classrooms with above-median proportions of CO2 concentrations greater than 1,000 ppm (Muscatiello | ||
| Higher level of CO2 was associated with an increased incidence of mucosal symptoms and general symptoms (Zhang | ||
| CO2 values higher than 2,100 ppm were associated with exercise-induced wheezing and night cough among pupils (Fraga | ||
| Higher levels of CO2 in schools were connected with a higher risk of experiencing upper, lower airways and systemic outcomes (Baloch | ||
| Air pressure | Positive air pressure (5–7 Pa) decreased nose irritation, dryness of facial skin and tiredness in a school, where occupants’ symptoms were suspected to be related to the impurities leaked indoors through the building envelope (Vornanen-Winqvist | According to the National Building Code of Finland, in a new building, positive air pressure should not cause long-term moisture load into the structures and negative air pressure should not allow harmful contaminant to enter into indoor air ( |
| Air humidity | Modest increase in respiratory symptoms over both at low (<30%) and high RH (>50%) among teachers (Angelon-Gaetz | |
| Current asthma, asthma attacks and asthma medication were positively associated with indoor relative air humidity (Mi | ||
| Relative humidity was associated with increased odds of suffering from lower airways and systemic disorders among schoolchildren (Baloch | ||
| Room temperature | Increased room temperature was related to nasal and throat symptoms, headache and tiredness ( | In Finland, target value for room temperature is 20°C– 23°C during heating season (Finnish Ministry of the Environment, 2012) |
| Room temperatures above 22 °C increased mucosal irritation and general symptoms such as headache and tiredness may occur in temperate climates (Zhang | ||
| NO2 | An increase in indoor NO2 was associated with current asthma and asthma medication. Outdoor NO2 was associated with current asthma (Mi | The WHO guideline value is 200 μg/m3 for 1-h NO2 concentration ( |
| NO2 might be related to mucosal symptoms, and skin symptoms (Zhang | ||
| Pupils reported more wheezing at increased outdoor level of NO2 (Kim | ||
| SO2 | SO2 might be related to general symptoms, mucosal symptoms and skin symptoms (Zhang | The 24-h average WHO guideline value for SO2 is 20 μg/m3 ( |
| Both indoor and outdoor SO2 were positively associated with prevalence of school-related symptoms (Zhang | ||
| O3 | Indoor O3 was positively associated with prevalence of skin symptoms (Zhang | The daily maximum 8-h mean of WHO guideline value for O3 is 100 μg/m3 ( |
| Elevated levels of ozone were significantly related to a variety of symptoms (Baloch | ||
| VOC | Pupils exposed to higher total VOC concentrations (the median concentration of 140.3 μg/m3) had a twofold increased risk of having asthma-related symptoms (Madureira | WHO recommendation is 100 µg/m3 (30 min) ( |
| Increased number of VOCs was connected to a higher risk for upper and lower airways and systemic disorders (Baloch | ||
| Formaldehyde | Indoor exposure to formaldehyde was related to asthma-like symptoms among pupils (Madureira | WHO and Finnish standard specify the maximum short-term (30 min) guideline of 0.1 mg/m3 (Finnish Ministry of the Environment, 2012; |
| A high prevalence of rhinoconjunctivitis in the past year was found in children using classrooms with high levels of formaldehyde (Annesi-Maesano | ||
| Particulate matters (PM2.5 and PM10): contaminants, including viruses, bacteria, allergens, fungi and traffic emissions | Both indoor and outdoor PM10 was associated with increased incidence and decreased remission of most types of SBS symptoms such as facial and hand rash or itching; eye irritation; nasal catarrh and obstruction; dryness in the throat; sore throat; irritating cough; headache (Zhang | The WHO health based standard for PM10 is a maximum of 50 µg/m3 as a 24-h mean value ( |
| The indoor median concentration of PM2.5 and PM10 that exceed the 25 μg/m3 and 50 μg/m3 levels of WHO air quality guidelines for a sampling period of 24 h increased the odds of asthma-like symptoms among pupils (Madureira | ||
| High fungal concentrations were associated with respiratory symptoms of children in concrete/brick schools but not in wooden schools (Meklin | ||
| Certain moulds were associated with the respiratory symptoms of children (Simoni |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.