Results of binary logistic regression to predict Indoor Environmental Quality user satisfaction based on design factors: Hosmer–Lemeshow test, odds ratios are reported with confidence intervals, parentheses and p-value (N = 579)
| Variable | Privacy | Concentration | Communication | Social contact | Territoriality | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR(CI 95%) | p- value | OR(CI 95%) | p- value | OR(CI 95%) | p- value | OR(CI 95%) | p- value | OR(CI 95%) | p- value | |
| Desk location | 0.010 | 0.066 | 0.027 | 0.141 | 0.006 | |||||
| 0-2 m | 0.49 (0.28-0.85) | 0.011 | 0.72 (0.41-1.26) | 0.250 | 0.47 (0.26-0.82) | 0.009 | 0.56 (0.27-1.15) | 0.119 | 0.44 (0.26-0.75) | 0.003 |
| 2-4 m | 0.40 (0.22-0.73) | 0.003 | 0.49 (0.27-0.91) | 0.024 | 0.48 (0.26-0.87) | 0.017 | 0.47 (0.22-0.99) | 0.048 | 0.43 (0.24-0.76) | 0.004 |
| Orientation | 0.001 | p < 0.001 | 0.034 | 0.213 | 0.007 | |||||
| S.E | 1.77 (0.92-3.43) | 0.087 | 1.59 (0.82-3.05) | 0.164 | 0.97 (0.50-1.85) | 0.929 | 1.48 (0.65-3.40) | 0.346 | 1.80 (0.95-3.41) | 0.068 |
| S.W | 0.75 (0.42-1.31) | 0.317 | 0.52 (0.30-0.91) | 0.024 | 0.63 (0.37-1.06) | 0.088 | 0.71 (0.39-1.30) | 0.273 | 0.70 (0.41-1.2) | 0.205 |
| N.E | 1.75 (0.99-3.10) | 0.053 | 1.32 (0.76-2.31) | 0.320 | 1.16 (0.66-2.02) | 0.593 | 0.86 (0.45-1.62) | 0.646 | 1.15 (0.66-2.00) | 0.604 |
| Layout | p < 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.463 | – | – | 0.018 | ||||
| Open | 0.29 (0.17-0.49) | p < 0.001 | 0.37 (0.21-0.63) | p < 0.001 | 0.70 (0.42-1.16) | 0.169 | – | – | 0.55 (0.33-0.90) | 0.019 |
| Combi | 0.52 (0.25-1.08) | 0.080 | 0.46 (0.22-0.99) | 0.047 | 0.96 (0.46-1.97) | 0.913 | – | – | 0.97 (0.48-1.98) | 0.951 |
| Flex | 0.27 (0.15-0.50) | p < 0.001 | 0.33 (0.17-0.61) | p < 0.001 | 0.86 (0.48-1.54) | 0.626 | – | – | 0.45 (0.25-0.81) | 0.008 |
| WWR | – | – | 0.314 | – | – | 0.295 | – | – | ||
| 30% | – | – | 0.89 (0.44-1.79) | 0.748 | – | – | 0.67 (0.34-1.33) | 0.257 | – | – |
| 50% | – | – | 0.70 (0.44-1.10) | 0.130 | – | – | 0.73 (0.47-1.14) | 0.174 | – | – |
| R2 | 0.129 | R2 | 0.120 | R2 | 0.050 | R2 | 0.040 | R2 | 0.081 | |
| HL test | 0.529 | HL test | 0.364 | HL test | 0.435 | HL test | 0.337 | HL test | 0.414 | |
| Classification (%) | 69.8 | Classification (%) | 68.0 | Classification (%) | 60.6 | Classification (%) | 75.4 | Classification (%) | 65.9 | |
| Variable | Privacy | Concentration | Communication | Social contact | Territoriality | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR(CI 95%) | OR(CI 95%) | OR(CI 95%) | OR(CI 95%) | OR(CI 95%) | ||||||
| Desk location | 0.066 | 0.141 | ||||||||
| 0-2 m | 0.72 (0.41-1.26) | 0.250 | 0.56 (0.27-1.15) | 0.119 | ||||||
| 2-4 m | 0.49 (0.27-0.91) | 0.024 | 0.47 (0.22-0.99) | 0.048 | ||||||
| Orientation | 0.213 | |||||||||
| S.E | 1.77 (0.92-3.43) | 0.087 | 1.59 (0.82-3.05) | 0.164 | 0.97 (0.50-1.85) | 0.929 | 1.48 (0.65-3.40) | 0.346 | 1.80 (0.95-3.41) | 0.068 |
| S.W | 0.75 (0.42-1.31) | 0.317 | 0.63 (0.37-1.06) | 0.088 | 0.71 (0.39-1.30) | 0.273 | 0.70 (0.41-1.2) | 0.205 | ||
| N.E | 1.75 (0.99-3.10) | 0.053 | 1.32 (0.76-2.31) | 0.320 | 1.16 (0.66-2.02) | 0.593 | 0.86 (0.45-1.62) | 0.646 | 1.15 (0.66-2.00) | 0.604 |
| Layout | 0.463 | – | – | |||||||
| Open | 0.70 (0.42-1.16) | 0.169 | – | – | ||||||
| Combi | 0.52 (0.25-1.08) | 0.080 | 0.96 (0.46-1.97) | 0.913 | – | – | 0.97 (0.48-1.98) | 0.951 | ||
| Flex | 0.86 (0.48-1.54) | 0.626 | – | – | ||||||
| WWR | – | – | 0.314 | – | – | 0.295 | – | – | ||
| 30% | – | – | 0.89 (0.44-1.79) | 0.748 | – | – | 0.67 (0.34-1.33) | 0.257 | – | – |
| 50% | – | – | 0.70 (0.44-1.10) | 0.130 | – | – | 0.73 (0.47-1.14) | 0.174 | – | – |
| 0.129 | 0.120 | 0.050 | 0.040 | 0.081 | ||||||
| HL test | 0.529 | HL test | 0.364 | HL test | 0.435 | HL test | 0.337 | HL test | 0.414 | |
| Classification (%) | 69.8 | Classification (%) | 68.0 | Classification (%) | 60.6 | Classification (%) | 75.4 | Classification (%) | 65.9 | |
Notes:
B coefficients and odd ratios (95% CI) in bold highlighted are statistically significant (p < 0.05); the results of Omnibus test are statistically significant (p < 0.05); HL test refers Hosmer-Lemeshow test
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.