Table 4. The associations between the...

Table 4.

The associations between the perception of different factors related to the change process before the relocation and the change in environmental satisfaction after relocation. Odds ratios with lower and upper 95% confidence limits and p-values are reported. The adjusted model includes age, gender and managerial position as covariates. n = 85–95, depending on the predictor and model

			Unadjusted			Adjusted
Predictor	Category	OR	95% CI	p	OR	95% CI	p
Management’s reasons for change	Disagree (ref.)
	Neutral	6.32	2.01; 19.87	0.002	4.80	1.48; 15.54	0.009
	Agree	14.58	4.43; 48.06	<0.001	10.49	2.79; 39.44	0.001
Clear information about the aims	Disagree (ref.)
	Neutral	1.25	0.36; 4.34	0.72	1.50	0.40; 5.62	0.54
	Agree	4.14	1.56; 10.97	0.004	3.14	1.07; 9.18	0.037
Easy to understand the aims	Disagree (ref.)
	Neutral	1.04	0.26; 4.16	0.95	1.13	0.26; 4.82	0.87
	Agree	7.45	2.67; 20.80	<0.001	5.86	1.92; 17.86	0.002
Sufficient information on the progress of workspace design	Disagree (ref.)
	Neutral	0.77	0.19; 3.17	0.72	0.73	0.15; 3.59	0.70
	Agree	1.25	0.41; 3.76	0.70	1.19	0.35; 4.03	0.78
Sufficiently involved in the planning of new workspaces	Disagree (ref.)
	Neutral	1.77	0.65; 4.84	0.27	1.72	0.59; 5.06	0.32
	Agree	2.15	0.81; 5.73	0.13	1.31	0.43; 4.01	0.64
Have been able to influence the design	Disagree (ref.)
	Neutral	3.86	1.34; 11.10	0.012	3.66	1.13; 11.80	0.030
	Agree	6.17	1.89; 20.20	0.003	5.87	1.44; 23.93	0.014
Personnel's views taken into account well	Disagree (ref.)
	Neutral	8.29	2.43; 28.33	0.001	7.45	2.07; 26.89	0.002
	Agree	6.63	1.61; 27.29	0.009	5.03	1.02; 24.75	0.047

			Unadjusted			Adjusted
Predictor	Category	OR	95% CI	p	OR	95% CI	p
Management’s reasons for change	Disagree (ref.)
	Neutral	6.32	2.01; 19.87	0.002	4.80	1.48; 15.54	0.009
	Agree	14.58	4.43; 48.06	<0.001	10.49	2.79; 39.44	0.001
Clear information about the aims	Disagree (ref.)
	Neutral	1.25	0.36; 4.34	0.72	1.50	0.40; 5.62	0.54
	Agree	4.14	1.56; 10.97	0.004	3.14	1.07; 9.18	0.037
Easy to understand the aims	Disagree (ref.)
	Neutral	1.04	0.26; 4.16	0.95	1.13	0.26; 4.82	0.87
	Agree	7.45	2.67; 20.80	<0.001	5.86	1.92; 17.86	0.002
Sufficient information on the progress of workspace design	Disagree (ref.)
	Neutral	0.77	0.19; 3.17	0.72	0.73	0.15; 3.59	0.70
	Agree	1.25	0.41; 3.76	0.70	1.19	0.35; 4.03	0.78
Sufficiently involved in the planning of new workspaces	Disagree (ref.)
	Neutral	1.77	0.65; 4.84	0.27	1.72	0.59; 5.06	0.32
	Agree	2.15	0.81; 5.73	0.13	1.31	0.43; 4.01	0.64
Have been able to influence the design	Disagree (ref.)
	Neutral	3.86	1.34; 11.10	0.012	3.66	1.13; 11.80	0.030
	Agree	6.17	1.89; 20.20	0.003	5.87	1.44; 23.93	0.014
Personnel's views taken into account well	Disagree (ref.)
	Neutral	8.29	2.43; 28.33	0.001	7.45	2.07; 26.89	0.002
	Agree	6.63	1.61; 27.29	0.009	5.03	1.02; 24.75	0.047

Notes:

Statistically significant OR:s are indicated in italics

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable