Table 7. Path coefficients Hypothesis... | Emerald Publishing

Table 7.

Path coefficients

Hypothesis	Relationship	Path coefficient	t-value	95% bias corrected CI	p-value	Effect size (F2)	Supported
1a	Dep. exp. → Managers’ attitude	0.228	3.560	[0.11, 0.34]	0.000**	0.064	Yes
1b	Anxiety → Managers’ attitude	0.216	2.944	[−0.01, 0.3]	0.003**	0.053	Yes
1d	Locus of control → Managers’ attitude	−0.272	1.311	[−0.41, 0.35]	0.190	0.092	No
2a	Org. climate – pressure → Managers’ attitude	0.110	2.046	[0, 0.22]	0.041*	0.013	Yes
2b	Org. climate – welfare → Managers’ attitude	−0.103	1.105	[−0.22,0.14]	0.270	0.011	No
3	Managers’ attitude → Personality	−0.519	10.686	[−0.62, −0.43]	0.000*	0.368	Yes
	Personality → OCB-I	0.255	4.459	[0.15, 0.37]	0.000**	0.057	Yes
	Manager’s attitude → OCB-I	−0.207	2.742	[−0.35, −0.07]	0.006**	0.038	Yes

Hypothesis	Relationship	Path coefficient	t-value	95% bias corrected CI	p-value	Effect size (F2)	Supported
1a	Dep. exp. → Managers’ attitude	0.228	3.560	[0.11, 0.34]	0.000**	0.064	Yes
1b	Anxiety → Managers’ attitude	0.216	2.944	[−0.01, 0.3]	0.003**	0.053	Yes
1d	Locus of control → Managers’ attitude	−0.272	1.311	[−0.41, 0.35]	0.190	0.092	No
2a	Org. climate – pressure → Managers’ attitude	0.110	2.046	[0, 0.22]	0.041*	0.013	Yes
2b	Org. climate – welfare → Managers’ attitude	−0.103	1.105	[−0.22,0.14]	0.270	0.011	No
3	Managers’ attitude → Personality	−0.519	10.686	[−0.62, −0.43]	0.000*	0.368	Yes
	Personality → OCB-I	0.255	4.459	[0.15, 0.37]	0.000**	0.057	Yes
	Manager’s attitude → OCB-I	−0.207	2.742	[−0.35, −0.07]	0.006**	0.038	Yes

Notes:

H1c (Stress → Managers’ attitude) was not supported and was not included in the final model; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01