Table 1.

Inclusion criteria for the systematic literature review of VUCA

Inclusion criteriaRationale
Published in peer-reviewed journalsPeer-reviewed journals were considered to be of higher quality than non-peer-reviewed articles
Selection of papers published 1999–2021The year 1999 was selected as a starting point because of the emergence date of studies on VUCA
Elements of VUCA were addressed within the context of work domains as this is one of the focuses of the paperThe aim of the review was to analyse and map the different features of VUCA to improve conceptual clarity and understanding
Published in the English languageEnglish was the dominant language in the field
Inclusion of all the components of VUCAThe focus was on the acronym, so the four components (volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity) should be considered
Different types of articles considered (e.g. empirical, literature review, conceptual)The focus of the study was to evaluate and synthesise the various constructs inherent to the acronym VUCA

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal