Table I

Contrasting frontline employees with service robots

DimensionService employeesService robots
Micro: service training and learningAct as individuals
Need training
Individual learning
Limited memory and access
Understanding needed
Act as part of systems, are connected
Upgradable, system-wide
System learning
Virtually endless memory and access
Pattern recognition
Micro:
customer experience
Heterogeneous output
Customization and personalization depend on employee skill and effort
Unintended biases
Homogenous output
Customization and personalization can be delivered on scale at consistent quality and performance
Potentially no biases
 Have genuine emotions
Can engage in deep acting
Can mimic emotions
Can engage in surface acting
 Can engage in out-of-box thinking and creative problem solving
Good in professional service roles (PSRs)
Limited out-of-box thinking, has rule-bound limits

Good in subordinate service roles (SSRs)
Meso:
market level
Service employees can be a source of competitive advantage
High incremental cost
Low economies of scale and scope
Differentiation on service can be based on better hiring, selection, training, motivation, and organization of service employees
Service robots are unlikely to be a source of competitive advantage
Low incremental cost
High economies of scale and scope
Economies of scale and scope and related network and service platform effects will become important sources of competitive advantage
Macro:
societal level
Important services are expensive and scarce if delivered by service employees (e.g. healthcare)

Many service employees work in unattractive jobs (e.g. call center agents and cashiers)
Cost savings of robot-delivered services will be competed away, leading to lower prices, and increased consumption and higher standards of living
Mundane and unattractive service jobs can be robot-delivered

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal