Table 2

Related grounded theory studies in the field of Agile software development

AuthorTransitionPracticeRoleKey focus/Insight
Hussain et al. (2009)  xxInvestigates how the integration and user-centered design is carried out in practice using grounded theory
Hoda (2011) xxxHighlights the importance of adequate customer involvement on Agile projects and the impact of different levels of customer
Dorairaj et al. (2012)   xInvestigates the emergent key concerns, particularly the impact of trust, in distributed Agile teams
Hoda et al. (2012)  xxIdentifies the balancing acts performed by self-organizing Agile teams between (1) freedom and responsibility, (2) specialization and cross-functionality and (3) continuous learning and iteration pressure in an effort to maintain their self-organizing nature
Gandomani et al. (2013) xxxHighlight's problems, hindrances and challenges during the Agile transformation process. The challenges are mainly in organizational culture, management, people and process areas
Van Waardenburg and Van Vliet (2013)  xxDiscusses challenges and possible solutions when Agile methods and plan-driven development co-existence within an organization
Gandomani et al. (2014a) xxxIdentify eight major facilitators that should be used by Agile teams to support Agile transition and adoption
Gandomani et al. (2014a) xxxThis study shows that people's behaviors can be a barrier when transitioning to Agile
Waterman et al. (2015)  xxSuggest five strategies that teams use to determine how much architecture to design up-front
Gandomani and Nafchi (2015) x  Provides an Agile transition model in the form of PDCA (plan, do, check, adjust)
Gandomani et al. (2015) xxxDiscovers that inadequate and dysfunctional training was one of the critical issues that affected the Agile transformation process
Gandomani and Nafchi (2016) xxxDescribes the origins and reasons of human-related challenges throughout the Agile transition process. The results show that the root of the emerged issues is the people's perceptions about Agile transition
Stray et al. (2016)  xxStudies how daily stand-up meetings are conducted and what the positive and negative attitudes toward them are
Hoda and Noble (2017) xxxPresents the theory of becoming Agile considers an Agile transition to take place within a multidimensional network of ongoing changes in different areas of practice
Jovanović et al. (2017) x xIdentifies how traditional organizational roles are transformed toward Agile roles and how they are influenced by various circumstances
Masood et al. (2020a)  xxPresents a comprehensive grounded theory of making self-assignment work, which explains the context and conditions that give rise to the need for self-assignment
Masood et al. (2020b)  x Shows how Scrum works in practice as compared to how it is presented in its formative books. The authors identified significant variations when comparing the formative descriptions and the “real world setting”
Shastri et al. (2021a)  xxHighlights the continued presence of the role of the project manager in Agile software projects as a part of the transition from traditional to Agile ways of working
Shastri et al. (2021b)  xxPresents and describes the Scrum master's role in Agile projects and find a positive association between the presence of the Scrum master and the frequency with which Agile practices are carried out by the team

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal