Table 2 Results from the multilevel...

Table 2

Results from the multilevel analysis for employees’ mentoring intention

Independent and control variables	Model 0		Model 1a		Model 1b		Model 2
Independent and control variables	b	se	b	se	b	se	b	se
*Fixed effects*^a
Employee level (Level 2)^c
Control variables
Age (years)			0.01	0.01	0.01****	0.01	0.02*	0.01
Hierarchical plateauing			−0.36***	0.09	−0.36***	0.09	−0.37***	0.08
Experience as a mentor (1 = yes)			0.42**	0.16	0.42**	0.16	0.44**	0.16
Experience as a protégé (1 = yes)			0.57***	0.16	0.56***	0.16	0.53**	0.15
Helpfulness			0.23*	0.10	0.24**	0.09	0.23*	0.09
Gender (1 = female)			−0.22	0.14	−0.24****	0.14	−0.20	0.14
Developmental proactivity			0.66***	0.14	0.69***	0.14	0.68***	0.14
Vignette level (Level 1)
Control conditions
Protégé willingness to learn					1.30***	0.07	1.25***	0.07
Protégé–mentor similarity					0.30***	0.07	0.32***	0.07
Experimental conditions
Co-mentor's mentoring support							0.41***	0.07
Supervisor's support for self-initiation							0.78***	0.07
Learning opportunities							0.40***	0.07
Time pressure							−0.56***	0.07
Organisational restructuring							−0.19**	0.07
Intercept	5.30***	0.07	4.76***	0.14	3.95***	0.15	3.55***	0.17
*Variance covariance estimates (random effects)*^b
σ²e	3.12***		3.12***		2.67***		2.34***
σ²μ0	3.35***		2.72***		2.71***		2.73***
−2 Log Likelihood (−2LL)	11,229.19		11,098.71		10,801.02		10,559.54
χ²			130.48***		297.69***		241.48***
df change			7		2		5
AIC	11,235.19		11,118.71		10,825.02		10,593.54
R² Level 1 (vignette level)			–		0.15		0.10
R² Level 2 (employee level)			0.19		–		–

Independent and control variables	Model 0		Model 1a		Model 1b		Model 2
Independent and control variables	b	se	b	se	b	se	b	se
Fixed effects^a
Employee level (Level 2)^c
Control variables
Age (years)			0.01	0.01	0.01****	0.01	0.02*	0.01
Hierarchical plateauing			−0.36***	0.09	−0.36***	0.09	−0.37***	0.08
Experience as a mentor (1 = yes)			0.42**	0.16	0.42**	0.16	0.44**	0.16
Experience as a protégé (1 = yes)			0.57***	0.16	0.56***	0.16	0.53**	0.15
Helpfulness			0.23*	0.10	0.24**	0.09	0.23*	0.09
Gender (1 = female)			−0.22	0.14	−0.24****	0.14	−0.20	0.14
Developmental proactivity			0.66***	0.14	0.69***	0.14	0.68***	0.14
Vignette level (Level 1)
Control conditions
Protégé willingness to learn					1.30***	0.07	1.25***	0.07
Protégé–mentor similarity					0.30***	0.07	0.32***	0.07
Experimental conditions
Co-mentor's mentoring support							0.41***	0.07
Supervisor's support for self-initiation							0.78***	0.07
Learning opportunities							0.40***	0.07
Time pressure							−0.56***	0.07
Organisational restructuring							−0.19**	0.07
Intercept	5.30***	0.07	4.76***	0.14	3.95***	0.15	3.55***	0.17
Variance covariance estimates (random effects)^b
σ²e	3.12***		3.12***		2.67***		2.34***
σ²μ0	3.35***		2.72***		2.71***		2.73***
−2 Log Likelihood (−2LL)	11,229.19		11,098.71		10,801.02		10,559.54
χ²			130.48***		297.69***		241.48***
df change			7		2		5
AIC	11,235.19		11,118.71		10,825.02		10,593.54
R² Level 1 (vignette level)			–		0.15		0.10
R² Level 2 (employee level)			0.19		–		–

Notes:

p (rho) = 0.52;

****p < 0.10;

*p < 0.05;

**p < 0.01;

***p < 0.001. n = 845 respondents; 2,520 vignettes (15 identical vignettes were dropped from the final analysis);

Maximum likelihood estimation is used.

Variance components covariance structure used to mimic the composite residual of Model 0–2.

Non-significant coefficients for occupational tenure, other-oriented empathy, locus of control, leadership position and educational attainment are removed for reasons of parsimony and to improve readability.

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable