Contributions made by KIBS firms to the DS journey of SMEs (perspective of the problems of SMEs)
| Problem | Discussion and generalization of case study findings |
|---|---|
| Financial paradoxes | SMEs become aware of the financial risks associated with DS, thank to the role played by their KIBS partners in the early stage of the DS journey; however, despite they trust their partners, they do neither delegate the crucial financial decisions nor ask for support in evaluating the pay back of the new digital offering. As a result, the contribution of KIBS appears rather negligible due to the reluctance of the SMEs to share sensitive data Setting up a clear roadmap can facilitate the balance between servitization (e.g. Stages 1 and 4 in our case) and digitalization (e.g. Stages 2 and 3 in our case) |
| Culture and organization | A long-term roadmap facilitates cultural and organizational changes. KIBS firms contribute to this process by providing digital competences and collaborating to put in place the organizational interventions |
| Limited resources and knowledge gaps | A KIBS partner that integrates professional and technological services is of great help in overcoming the limitation of resources of SMEs and fulfilling the numerous knowledge gaps of the DS challenges |
| Access to customer’s data | In the preliminary stages, KIBS contribute to exploring customer needs and market opportunities for DS. The use of a ready-to-go/easy-to-use digital platform can increase the reputation of smaller manufacturers as provider of digital services. With a branded platform, customers can be more easily convinced to connect their equipment and share their data |
| Operational complexity | The provision of a digital platform that incorporates standard packages and pre-arranged workflows can reduce the operational complexity stemming from the move to digital services |
| Business ecosystems | KIBS can contribute to orchestrating third parties, setting the ground for the creation of new digital service ecosystems |
| Discussion and generalization of case study findings | |
|---|---|
| SMEs become aware of the financial risks associated with DS, thank to the role played by their KIBS partners in the early stage of the DS journey; however, despite they trust their partners, they do neither delegate the crucial financial decisions nor ask for support in evaluating the pay back of the new digital offering. As a result, the contribution of KIBS appears rather negligible due to the reluctance of the SMEs to share sensitive data | |
| A long-term roadmap facilitates cultural and organizational changes. KIBS firms contribute to this process by providing digital competences and collaborating to put in place the organizational interventions | |
| A KIBS partner that integrates professional and technological services is of great help in overcoming the limitation of resources of SMEs and fulfilling the numerous knowledge gaps of the DS challenges | |
| In the preliminary stages, KIBS contribute to exploring customer needs and market opportunities for DS. The use of a ready-to-go/easy-to-use digital platform can increase the reputation of smaller manufacturers as provider of digital services. With a branded platform, customers can be more easily convinced to connect their equipment and share their data | |
| The provision of a digital platform that incorporates standard packages and pre-arranged workflows can reduce the operational complexity stemming from the move to digital services | |
| KIBS can contribute to orchestrating third parties, setting the ground for the creation of new digital service ecosystems |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.