Table 2 Direct effects Hypotheses... | Emerald Publishing

Table 2

Direct effects

Hypotheses	Relationships	Path coeff.	St. dev.	p-values
H1	Health risks → Motivation to adopt DT	−0.165	0.078	0.018
	Obsolescence risk → Motivation to adopt DT	0.219	0.081	0.004
	Security risks → Motivation to adopt DT	0.157	0.096	0.050
	Social risks → Motivation to adopt DT	−0.267	0.078	0.000
H2	Health risks → Intention to use DT	−0.147	0.074	0.023
	Obsolescence risk → Intention to use DT	0.158	0.057	0.003
	Security risks → Intention to use DT	0.115	0.069	0.046
	Social risks → Intention to use DT	−0.115	0.071	0.052
H3	Motivation to adopt DT → Intention to use DT	0.629	0.052	0.000

Hypotheses	Relationships	Path coeff.	St. dev.	p-values
H1	Health risks → Motivation to adopt DT	−0.165	0.078	0.018
	Obsolescence risk → Motivation to adopt DT	0.219	0.081	0.004
	Security risks → Motivation to adopt DT	0.157	0.096	0.050
	Social risks → Motivation to adopt DT	−0.267	0.078	0.000
H2	Health risks → Intention to use DT	−0.147	0.074	0.023
	Obsolescence risk → Intention to use DT	0.158	0.057	0.003
	Security risks → Intention to use DT	0.115	0.069	0.046
	Social risks → Intention to use DT	−0.115	0.071	0.052
H3	Motivation to adopt DT → Intention to use DT	0.629	0.052	0.000

Source(s): Authors with SmartPLS 4 (Ringle et al., 2022)