Table 3

Firms with high and low quality of code of ethics

Nr_AVGr_GLSr_CTr_OJr_ET
Panel A: Means
ETHICS in the upper quartile(1)5489.40%7.48%9.84%7.57%11.96%
ETHICS in the lower quartile(2)8619.84%8.07%10.59%8.46%12.99%
Difference(1)–(2) −0.44%**−0.59%***−0.75%***−0.89%*−1.03%**
t-Statistic  −1.64−3.381.75−1.39−1.76
One sided p-value  (0.05)(<0.01)(<0.01)(0.08)(0.04)
Panel B: Medians
ETHICS in the upper quartile(1)5488.08%7.02%10.82%1.00%8.78%
ETHICS in the lower quartile(2)8618.61%7.76%11.16%2.08%9.74%
Difference(1)–(2) −0.53%***−0.74%**−0.34%**−1.08%***−0.96%***
Z-Statistic  −2.27−4.461.33−2.38−4.46
One sided p-value  (0.01)(0.04)(0.05)(0.01)(<0.01)

Note(s): This table presents mean (panel A) and median (panel B) comparison tests for four individual and average cost of capital estimates across subsamples of upper and lower quartiles of ETHICS. The total sample includes 548 firm-year observations in the upper quartile subsample and 861 firm-year observations in the lower quartile subsample for the period between 2004 and 2012. ***, **, and * indicate statistical significance at the 0.01, 0.05, and 0.10 level, respectively. A more detailed description of the variables is in  Appendix A

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal