Individual measure of code of ethics quality and individual estimate of the cost of equity
| Dependent variable: Individual Cost of equity Estimates | Dependent variable: r_AVG | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r_GLS | r_CT | r_OJ | r_ET | |||||||
| Predicted sign | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | |
| ETHICS | − | −0.324*** (−5.53) | −0.265** (−2.29) | −0.626** (−2.17) | −0.468** (−2.38) | |||||
| SYSTEM | − | −0.096 (−1.45) | −0.430*** (−3.14) | |||||||
| IMPLEMENT | − | −0.141 (−1.59) | −0.044* (−1.76) | |||||||
| CORRUPT | − | −0.255** (−1.91) | −0.560*** (−4.01) | |||||||
| HUMAN | − | −0.404** (−2.00) | −0.397* (−1.98) | |||||||
| Control variables | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Year fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Industry fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| N | 2,207 | 2,207 | 2,207 | 2,207 | 2,207 | 2,207 | 2,207 | 2,207 | 2,207 | |
| R2 | 19.78% | 13.43% | 5.21% | 15.14% | 13.47% | 13.51% | 13.66% | 13.65% | 14.24% | |
| Dependent variable: | Dependent variable: | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predicted sign | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | |
| − | ||||||||||
| − | ||||||||||
| − | ||||||||||
| − | ||||||||||
| − | ||||||||||
| Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| Year fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Industry fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| 2,207 | 2,207 | 2,207 | 2,207 | 2,207 | 2,207 | 2,207 | 2,207 | 2,207 | ||
| 19.78% | 13.43% | 5.21% | 15.14% | 13.47% | 13.51% | 13.66% | 13.65% | 14.24% | ||
Note(s): This table presents the regression results of regressing the average cost of equity (r_AVG) on ETHICS and control variables over the sample period between 2004 and 2012. Robust standard errors are clustered by firms. t-statistics are reported inside the parentheses. ***, **, and * indicate statistical significance at the 0.01, 0.05, and 0.10 level, respectively. A more detailed description of the variables is in Appendix A