Table 2

Fit statistics from measurement model comparison

Modelsχ2/dfCFITLIRMSEASRMRΔχ2Δdf
Full measurement model236.93/1430.950.940.070.07  
Model Aa498.61/1460.820.780.130.13261.68***3
Model Bb371.73/1460.880.860.100.09134.80***3
Model Cc842.54/1480.640.580.180.16605.61***5
Model Dd412.52/1460.860.840.110.12175.59***3
Model Ee459.60/1460.840.810.120.15222.67***3
Model Ff669.10/1480.730.680.150.16432.17***5
Model Gg (Harman's single factor test)1010.77/1490.550.480.190.18773.84***6

Note(s):N = 153, ***p < 0.001; χ2 = chi-square discrepancy, df = degrees of freedom; CFI=comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker–Lewis Index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; SRMR= standardized root mean square residual; = difference in chi-square, = difference in degrees of freedom. In all measurement models, error terms were free to covary to improve fit and help reduce bias in the estimated parameter values. All models are compared to the full measurement model

a = HR analytics and evidence-based management combined into a single factor

b = HR analytics and technology combined into a single factor

c = HR analytics, evidence-based management and technology combined into one factor

d = Evidence-based management and organizational performance combined into a single factor

e = HR analytics and organizational performance combined into a single factor

f = HR analytics, evidence-based management and organizational performance combined into a single factor

g = All factors combined into a single factor

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal