Principles of dialogic accounting applied to popular reporting
| Principles of dialogic accounting | Application to popular reporting (PR) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Recognition of multiple ideological orientations | PR represents and gives voice to the conflicting positions of different groups of citizens and politicians, and therefore, to divergent ideologies. |
| 2 | Avoiding monetary reductionism | PR provides both quantitative and qualitative information that can satisfy information needs of the various actors and allows for a choice. |
| 3 | Openness about the subjectivity and contestable nature of calculations | PR guarantees greater information to citizens by reducing conflicts related to information asymmetry between government and citizens. |
| 4 | Enabling access for non-experts | PR gives access to all stakeholders, even those without specific technical skills and knowledge. |
| 5 | Ensuring an effective participatory process | The report should be structured by increasing the collection capacity of the need and increasing its diffusion through new distribution channels. |
| 6 | Attention to power relationships and their dynamics | PR is a tool that could be subject to powerful elites who have the ability to filter out some financial and non-financial results. However, through the certification of information by an external body, it is possible to manage this phenomenon. |
| 7 | Recognizing transformative potential | PR encourages social actors to be more reflective about the results and facilitate dialogue. |
| 8 | Resisting new forms of monologism | PR should not be a mere political communication tool where politicians and managers provide complete information according to the dialogic rhetoric concept. |
| Principles of dialogic accounting | Application to popular reporting (PR) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Recognition of multiple ideological orientations | PR represents and gives voice to the conflicting positions of different groups of citizens and politicians, and therefore, to divergent ideologies. |
| 2 | Avoiding monetary reductionism | PR provides both quantitative and qualitative information that can satisfy information needs of the various actors and allows for a choice. |
| 3 | Openness about the subjectivity and contestable nature of calculations | PR guarantees greater information to citizens by reducing conflicts related to information asymmetry between government and citizens. |
| 4 | Enabling access for non-experts | PR gives access to all stakeholders, even those without specific technical skills and knowledge. |
| 5 | Ensuring an effective participatory process | The report should be structured by increasing the collection capacity of the need and increasing its diffusion through new distribution channels. |
| 6 | Attention to power relationships and their dynamics | PR is a tool that could be subject to powerful elites who have the ability to filter out some financial and non-financial results. However, through the certification of information by an external body, it is possible to manage this phenomenon. |
| 7 | Recognizing transformative potential | PR encourages social actors to be more reflective about the results and facilitate dialogue. |
| 8 | Resisting new forms of monologism | PR should not be a mere political communication tool where politicians and managers provide complete information according to the dialogic rhetoric concept. |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.