Selected coding for nodes
| Category | Subnodes | Resultsa | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | One node per author | 71 | |||
| Affiliation name | One node per affiliation | 48 | |||
| Country of research | |||||
| Africa | 2 | ||||
| Ghana | 2 | ||||
| Asia | 4 | ||||
| Korea | 2 | ||||
| Taiwan | 1 | ||||
| Thailand | 1 | ||||
| Canada | 1 | ||||
| Europe | 20 | ||||
| Belgium | 1 | ||||
| Denmark | 1 | ||||
| Italy | 4 | ||||
| Norway | 3 | ||||
| Spain | 5 | ||||
| Sweden | 4 | ||||
| The Netherlands | 1 | ||||
| Turkey | 1 | ||||
| USA | 2 | ||||
| No specific country | 4 | ||||
| Size of entity | Small and medium-sized entities | 25 | |||
| Unspecified NFP or charity | 1 | ||||
| Listed (any size) | 3 | ||||
| Small and large | 2 | ||||
| Other | 2 | ||||
| Research method | |||||
| Case study | 1 | ||||
| Interviews | 7 | ||||
| Literature review – Normative | 2 | ||||
| Quantitative cross-sectional | 17 | ||||
| Quantitative longitudinal | 8 | ||||
| Viewpoint | 2 | ||||
| Other | 1 | ||||
| Theoretical perspective | |||||
| Resource dependency theory | 3 | ||||
| Agency theory | 17 | ||||
| Resource-based theory | 4 | ||||
| Stakeholder theory | 2 | ||||
| Stewardship theory | 5 | ||||
| Relational exchange theory | 1 | ||||
| Institutional theory | 1 | ||||
| Social capital theory | 1 | ||||
| Other | 7 | ||||
| Multiple theories | 8 | ||||
| No theory | 6 | ||||
| Category | Subnodes | Resultsa | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | One node per author | 71 | |||
| Affiliation name | One node per affiliation | 48 | |||
| Country of research | |||||
| Africa | 2 | ||||
| Ghana | 2 | ||||
| Asia | 4 | ||||
| Korea | 2 | ||||
| Taiwan | 1 | ||||
| Thailand | 1 | ||||
| Canada | 1 | ||||
| Europe | 20 | ||||
| Belgium | 1 | ||||
| Denmark | 1 | ||||
| Italy | 4 | ||||
| Norway | 3 | ||||
| Spain | 5 | ||||
| Sweden | 4 | ||||
| The Netherlands | 1 | ||||
| Turkey | 1 | ||||
| USA | 2 | ||||
| No specific country | 4 | ||||
| Size of entity | Small and medium-sized entities | 25 | |||
| Unspecified NFP or charity | 1 | ||||
| Listed (any size) | 3 | ||||
| Small and large | 2 | ||||
| Other | 2 | ||||
| Research method | |||||
| Case study | 1 | ||||
| Interviews | 7 | ||||
| Literature review – Normative | 2 | ||||
| Quantitative cross-sectional | 17 | ||||
| Quantitative longitudinal | 8 | ||||
| Viewpoint | 2 | ||||
| Other | 1 | ||||
| Theoretical perspective | |||||
| Resource dependency theory | 3 | ||||
| Agency theory | 17 | ||||
| Resource-based theory | 4 | ||||
| Stakeholder theory | 2 | ||||
| Stewardship theory | 5 | ||||
| Relational exchange theory | 1 | ||||
| Institutional theory | 1 | ||||
| Social capital theory | 1 | ||||
| Other | 7 | ||||
| Multiple theories | 8 | ||||
| No theory | 6 | ||||
Notes:
aAn article may have been coded twice, if applicable: for example, more than one theoretical perspective may be used in the article, or it may have more than one research method (mixed methods). Unused nodes have been removed from the table to aid understanding
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.