Table I Coding framework Coding criteria... | Emerald Publishing

Table I

Coding framework

Coding criteria	Description of code
Year	The year in which the paper was published in the journal
Relevance	Relevance to the study based on the journal title, paper title, abstract, keywords and reading of the paper
Sector studied	Empirical context, private B2C or B2B or public
Type of paper	Conceptual/theoretical or conceptual
Research strategy	Qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods
Data collection method	For example, observation, focus groups and interviews
Researcher’s role	Insider or outsider (Coughlan and Coghlan, 2002; Herr and Anderson, 2014; Sandberg and Wallo, 2013; Svensson et al., 2007)
Proximity	The extent to which the researcher and practitioner collaborate in problem formulation, analysis, application/use and writing (Nielsen and Svensson, 2006; Baskerville and Wood-Harper, 1996; Brydon-Miller et al., 2003; Sayer, 2010)
Outcome	Model, proposition, ideas, guidelines, descriptive insights, theoretical framework, research agenda, examples and new knowledge (developed from Barratt et al., 2011; Siva et al., 2016)
Quality criteria	Explicitly stated, and, if so, what type of validity (dialogic, outcome, catalytic, democratic, process, other; Herr and Anderson, 2005)
Knowledge interest	Epistemological characteristics in terms of Habermasian knowledge interests (technical, practical/communicative or emancipation; Habermas, 1972)

Coding criteria	Description of code
Year	The year in which the paper was published in the journal
Relevance	Relevance to the study based on the journal title, paper title, abstract, keywords and reading of the paper
Sector studied	Empirical context, private B2C or B2B or public
Type of paper	Conceptual/theoretical or conceptual
Research strategy	Qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods
Data collection method	For example, observation, focus groups and interviews
Researcher’s role	Insider or outsider (Coughlan and Coghlan, 2002; Herr and Anderson, 2014; Sandberg and Wallo, 2013; Svensson et al., 2007)
Proximity	The extent to which the researcher and practitioner collaborate in problem formulation, analysis, application/use and writing (Nielsen and Svensson, 2006; Baskerville and Wood-Harper, 1996; Brydon-Miller et al., 2003; Sayer, 2010)
Outcome	Model, proposition, ideas, guidelines, descriptive insights, theoretical framework, research agenda, examples and new knowledge (developed from Barratt et al., 2011; Siva et al., 2016)
Quality criteria	Explicitly stated, and, if so, what type of validity (dialogic, outcome, catalytic, democratic, process, other; Herr and Anderson, 2005)
Knowledge interest	Epistemological characteristics in terms of Habermasian knowledge interests (technical, practical/communicative or emancipation; Habermas, 1972)