Table 4. Comparison of the models of the... | Emerald Publishing

Table 4.

Comparison of the models of the relationships between OLC and SP and the SP dimensions

Model				Standardized regression weights		Measures of overall model fit
Model				Poland (n = 391)	Denmark (n = 303)
Model 1	OLC	→	SP	0.65	0.71	Χ²(88) = 307.248, Χ²/df = 3.491, NFI = 0.94, CFI = 0.962, RMSEA = 0.060, SRMR = 0.017
Model 1_ECO	OLC	→	Economic performance	0.55	0.57	Χ²(88) = 312.147, Χ²/df = 3.547, NFI = 0.946, CFI = 0.961, RMSEA = 0.061, SRMR = 0.017
Model 1_SOC	OLC	→	Social performance	0.64	0.66	Χ² (88) = 307,747, Χ²/df = 3.497, NFI = 0.948, CFI = 0.962, RMSEA = 0.060, SRMR = 0.017
Model 1_ENV	OLC	→	Environmental performance	0.41	0.57	Χ² (88) = 306,479, Χ²/df = 3.483, NFI = 0.946, CFI = 0.961, RMSEA = 0.060, SRMR = 0.017

Model				Standardized regression weights		Measures of overall model fit
Model				Poland(n = 391)	Denmark(n = 303)
Model 1	OLC	→	SP	0.65	0.71	Χ²(88) = 307.248, Χ²/df = 3.491, NFI = 0.94, CFI = 0.962, RMSEA = 0.060, SRMR = 0.017
Model 1_ECO	OLC	→	Economic performance	0.55	0.57	Χ²(88) = 312.147, Χ²/df = 3.547, NFI = 0.946, CFI = 0.961, RMSEA = 0.061, SRMR = 0.017
Model 1_SOC	OLC	→	Social performance	0.64	0.66	Χ² (88) = 307,747, Χ²/df = 3.497, NFI = 0.948, CFI = 0.962, RMSEA = 0.060, SRMR = 0.017
Model 1_ENV	OLC	→	Environmental performance	0.41	0.57	Χ² (88) = 306,479, Χ²/df = 3.483, NFI = 0.946, CFI = 0.961, RMSEA = 0.060, SRMR = 0.017

Note:

All estimated parameters are significant (p < 0.01)