Phases and stepwise application of ActS
| Step | Goals | Criterion | Outcome | Key informants | Means | Data collection tools | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conceptual criteria development phase (preface) | |||||||
| (1) Setting overall criteria for method development and/or use | To ensure that the overall design process is relevant | N/A | List of criteria: | Service design team | Reflective discussions | Field notes | |
| (1) Participatory | |||||||
| (2) Useful | |||||||
| (3) Capturing human activity sets | |||||||
| (4) Value reflecting | |||||||
| (5) Archetype | |||||||
| (6) Link to service | |||||||
| Initial method development/planning phase (preparing for the method use) | |||||||
| (2) Defining the activity goal/theme | To ensure that the activity goal or theme is relevant and understandable | Criterion 3 | Starting point for data collection: Guiding theme/goal to be studied | Service design team | Reflective discussions | Field notes | |
| (3) Defining an appropriate data collection method and design of data collection | To ensure the method is human-centric, emancipatory and useful | Criteria 1–4 | Base: Activityscape mapping (Mickelsson, 2014) method choice: Collaborative workshop (Kujala, 2003) | Service design team | Reflective discussions, internal planning workshops | Field notes | |
| (4) Preparing the techniques for data collection | To ensure proper data collection | Criteria 1, 2 | Process plan (questions, tasks, lists of materials) | Service design team | Internal planning workshop invitations to participate | Field notes | |
| To ensure the representativeness of participants | Defining useful participants | ||||||
| Data collection phase (use of the method to generate data) | |||||||
| (5) Identifying relevant activities within the activity set and their perceived value | To create activity sets (reflecting fun, sacrifice, frequency, importance) | Criteria 2, 4, 5 | Actionable activity map(s) with identified activities, key questions for primary customers, service design ideas | Individuals/potential users | Co-creative activity identification workshop | Maps | |
| Sticky notes | |||||||
| Ratings | |||||||
| Protocols | |||||||
| Pencils, markers | |||||||
| (6) Gathering service design ideas from workshop participants | To assist the designers in recognizing service design ideas | Criteria 1, 2, 6 | Lists of service development ideas | Individuals/potential users | Workshop task | Sticky notes | |
| Flipchart | |||||||
| Pens, coloured markers, pencils | |||||||
| Exploration and ideation phase (use of the generated data) | |||||||
| (7) Creating visualizations/archetype of activity sets (Holmlid and Blomvist, 2014) | To create a foundation for service innovation and design | Criteria 3, 4, 5 | Identified general patterns in the activity maps | Service design team and firm members | Map synthesis | Sketches | |
| Map analysis case company map analysis | Sticky notes | ||||||
| Maps | |||||||
| Markers, pencils | |||||||
| (8) Gathering alternative (other) stakeholder activity maps | To identify activity maps for other stakeholder groups | Criteria 2, 4, 6 | Identified preferences for development of the service from a multi-stakeholder view | Service design team and stakeholders; potential to widen to service system design | Stakeholder interviews and map creation | Sticky notes | |
| Maps | |||||||
| Pencils | |||||||
| Markers | |||||||
| (9) Key question generation by case company | To create input that can be used to identify spaces for potential new business concepts as well as input for the design | Criteria 2, 6 | Shared wider meanings for service ideation | Service design team, other employees | Development of key questions from other stakeholder groups and potential answers to them | Transcripts | |
| (10) Ideation based on activities and key questions as well as competitor offerings | To create actionable service design solutions | Criteria 2, 6 | Service concept ideas | Lead investigator, service design team | Case company workshop | Field notes | |
| Photographs | |||||||
| Step | Goals | Criterion | Outcome | Key informants | Means | Data collection tools | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Setting overall criteria for method development and/or use | To ensure that the overall design process is relevant | N/A | List of criteria: | Service design team | Reflective discussions | Field notes | |
| (1) Participatory | |||||||
| (2) Useful | |||||||
| (3) Capturing human activity sets | |||||||
| (4) Value reflecting | |||||||
| (5) Archetype | |||||||
| (6) Link to service | |||||||
| (2) Defining the activity goal/theme | To ensure that the activity goal or theme is relevant and understandable | Criterion 3 | Starting point for data collection: Guiding theme/goal to be studied | Service design team | Reflective discussions | Field notes | |
| (3) Defining an appropriate data collection method and design of data collection | To ensure the method is human-centric, emancipatory and useful | Criteria 1–4 | Base: Activityscape mapping ( | Service design team | Reflective discussions, internal planning workshops | Field notes | |
| (4) Preparing the techniques for data collection | To ensure proper data collection | Criteria 1, 2 | Process plan (questions, tasks, lists of materials) | Service design team | Internal planning workshop invitations to participate | Field notes | |
| To ensure the representativeness of participants | Defining useful participants | ||||||
| (5) Identifying relevant activities within the activity set and their perceived value | To create activity sets (reflecting fun, sacrifice, frequency, importance) | Criteria 2, 4, 5 | Actionable activity map(s) with identified activities, key questions for primary customers, service design ideas | Individuals/potential users | Co-creative activity identification workshop | Maps | |
| Sticky notes | |||||||
| Ratings | |||||||
| Protocols | |||||||
| Pencils, markers | |||||||
| (6) Gathering service design ideas from workshop participants | To assist the designers in recognizing service design ideas | Criteria 1, 2, 6 | Lists of service development ideas | Individuals/potential users | Workshop task | Sticky notes | |
| Flipchart | |||||||
| Pens, coloured markers, pencils | |||||||
| (7) Creating visualizations/archetype of activity sets ( | To create a foundation for service innovation and design | Criteria 3, 4, 5 | Identified general patterns in the activity maps | Service design team and firm members | Map synthesis | Sketches | |
| Map analysis case company map analysis | Sticky notes | ||||||
| Maps | |||||||
| Markers, pencils | |||||||
| (8) Gathering alternative (other) stakeholder activity maps | To identify activity maps for other stakeholder groups | Criteria 2, 4, 6 | Identified preferences for development of the service from a multi-stakeholder view | Service design team and stakeholders; potential to widen to service system design | Stakeholder interviews and map creation | Sticky notes | |
| Maps | |||||||
| Pencils | |||||||
| Markers | |||||||
| (9) Key question generation by case company | To create input that can be used to identify spaces for potential new business concepts as well as input for the design | Criteria 2, 6 | Shared wider meanings for service ideation | Service design team, other employees | Development of key questions from other stakeholder groups and potential answers to them | Transcripts | |
| (10) Ideation based on activities and key questions as well as competitor offerings | To create actionable service design solutions | Criteria 2, 6 | Service concept ideas | Lead investigator, service design team | Case company workshop | Field notes | |
| Photographs | |||||||