Cross comparison of the case firms across the generated processes of organisational identity development on SM
| Organisational identity development process within networks | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case firm: FB posts analysed | 1. Network relating | 2. Collaborating within networks | 3. Interacting with trends | 4. Connecting with community |
| A: 667 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| B: 356 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| C: 168 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| D: 90 | ✓ | ○ | ✓ | ○ |
| E: 169 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| F: 22 | ✓ | ○ | ○ | ○ |
| G: 18 | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ |
| H: 100 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| I: 62 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Organisational identity development process within networks | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Network relating | 2. Collaborating within networks | 3. Interacting with trends | 4. Connecting with community | |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| ✓ | ○ | ✓ | ○ | |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| ✓ | ○ | ○ | ○ | |
| ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Notes:
✓: The case firm displayed significant evidence of using this process to create an identity on SM, ○: The case firm displayed little or weak evidence of using this process to create an identity on SM, Case firms F & G rely on SM much less than the other case firms for organisational identity development
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.