Table 4 Path analysis results Path...

Table 4

Path analysis results

Path	Direct effect		Total effect		Indirect effect		H	Result
Path	Coefficient	t-value	Coefficient	t-value	Coefficient	t-value	H	Result
SE → PER	−0.196	0.784	−0.115	0.930			H1	Not supported
SE → MA			0.244^*	2.090			H2	Supported
MA → PER			0.357^***	3.244			H3	Supported
SE → MA → PER					0.087^†	1.824	H4	Supported
Control variables
#SP → PER	−0.214^*	2.037	−0.242^*	2.417
TEN → PER	0.079	0.974	0.116	1.480
GEN → PER	−0.011	0.147	0.030	0.370
PRI_EX → PER	0.052	0.548	0.057	0.688

Path	Direct effect		Total effect		Indirect effect		H	Result
Path	Coefficient	t-value	Coefficient	t-value	Coefficient	t-value	H	Result
SE → PER	−0.196	0.784	−0.115	0.930			H1	Not supported
SE → MA			0.244^*	2.090			H2	Supported
MA → PER			0.357^***	3.244			H3	Supported
SE → MA → PER					0.087^†	1.824	H4	Supported
Control variables
#SP → PER	−0.214^*	2.037	−0.242^*	2.417
TEN → PER	0.079	0.974	0.116	1.480
GEN → PER	−0.011	0.147	0.030	0.370
PRI_EX → PER	0.052	0.548	0.057	0.688

Note(s): n = 126 respondents

H = Hypothesis, SE = self-efficacy, PER = performance, MA = managerial attitude, #SP = number of specializations, TEN = tenure, GEN = gender, PRI EX = prior experience as head of unit

^***p < 0.001, ^*p < 0.05, ^†p < 0.1

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable