Table 6

Hypothesis verification details

IT industry
CountryPOLUSA
CV
Critical thinking, risk
Model A
Without CV
Model B
With CV
Model A
Without CV
Model B
With CV
Model C
With CV without PSI
R252%52%88%89%24%
CT->TKA0.29***0.38***0.38***
RISK->TKSnsnsns
RISK->PIns0.33***0.32***
χ2739.23(257)787.73(286)657.2(170)670.64(194)528.64(137)
CMIN/df2.872.753.873.453.85
RMSEA0.0730.0710.0870.0800.087
CFI0.8830.8810.8890.8960.894
TLI0.8640.8540.8630.8650.853
H1a0.71***0.72***0.75***0.75***0.75***
H1bnsns0.38***0.38***0.38***
H20.48***0.47***0.46***0.46***0.46***
H3a0.43***0.35***nsnsns
H3bnsns0.29**0.21*0.20*
H40.38***0.39***0.67***0.69***0.69***
H50.22*0.22*nsnsns
H60.10*nsnsns
H70.19**0.19***0.29**0.31***0.31**
H8nsnsnsns
H90.67***0.67***0.89***0.87***
Mediation analysis for best-fitted Model B (bolded)Direct/indirect/total effectMediation typeDirect/indirect/total effectMediation type
KC->LCA->LCM0.11(ns)/0.37(**)/0.51(**)Full mediation (indirect only)0.38(ns)/0.34(*)/0.72(*)Full mediation
(indirect only)
LCA->LCM->TKA0.24(***)/0.005(ns)/0.23(**)No mediation0.08(ns)/0.09(ns)/0.18(ns)No mediation
TKA->TKS->PI0.24(*)/0.12(*)/0.36(**)Complementary mediation0.02(ns)/0.21(*)/0.23(*)Full mediation
(indirect only)
TKS->PI->PSI0.05(ns)/0.09(ns)/0.11(ns)No mediation0.10(ns)/0.28(*)/0.38(*)Full mediation (indirect only)

Notes:

***

p < 0.001;

**

p < 0.01;

*

p < 0.05. Poland, n = 350/USA, n = 379; ML = standardized results;

best fit (selected) model results are in bold

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options