Table 2

Items and factor loadings

Construct (source)ItemsStandardized loadings
Service robot anthropomorphism (Lu et al., 2019)(1)The robot has a mind of its own0.85
(2)The robot has consciousness0.90
(3)The robot has its own free will0.92
(4)The robot experiences emotions0.90
(5)The robot has intentions0.73
Service robot social presence (Lee et al., 2006)(1)I feel as if I was interacting with an intelligent being0.86
(2)I feel as if I was accompanied by an intelligent being0.84
(3)I was involved with the robot0.82
(4)I feel as if I was responding to the robot0.82
(5)I feel as if I and the robot were communicating to each other0.85
Service robot utilitarian value (Lu et al., 2019)(1)The robot is more accurate than human employees0.76
(2)Information provided by the robot is more accurate with less human errors0.90
(3)The robot provides more consistent service than human employees0.87
(4)Information provided by the robot is more consistent0.72
Service robot hedonic value (Lu et al., 2019)(1)I have fun interacting with the robot0.91
(2)Interacting with the robot is fun0.90
(3)Interacting with the robot is entertaining0.82
(4)The actual process of interacting with the robot is pleasant0.79
FLE interaction quality (Brady and Cronin, 2001)(1)Overall, I'd say the quality of my interaction with this restaurant's employees is excellent0.88
(2)I would say that the quality of my interaction with this restaurant's employees is high0.92
(3)The attitude of this restaurant's human employees demonstrates their willingness to help me0.90
Customer repatronage intentions (Maxham and Netemeyer, 2002)(1)I expect to eat at this restaurant again in the next six months0.94
(2)I am certain that I will be eating at this restaurant again in the next six months0.96

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal