Social innovation in service research
| Authors | Research aim | Type of paper | Definition/operationalization | Main contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubalcaba (2016) | To develop a framework for understanding the relationship between social, service, and systems innovation | Conceptual | Defines social innovation as “the outcome of three elements: social goals prevalence (vs just business goals), social means for complex systemic co-productions (vs nonsystemic) and service and non-technological innovation outcomes (vs mainly goods-oriented outcomes)” | A three dimensional model of social innovation as the outcome of three elements |
| Toivonen (2018) | To develop a research agenda for the examination of social and service innovation | Conceptual | Building on Rubalcaba’s (2016) conceptualization, Toivonen emphasizes the social means of innovation | Highlights the need for research exploring the nature of social innovation and development of governing structures and innovation policies |
| Gallouj et al. (2018) | To develop a framework to elucidate the relationship between social and service innovation | Conceptual | Defines social innovation as “new service solutions to societal challenges aiming to increase welfare by value co-creation and co-implementation through co-production among multiple empowered actors” (s. 553) | A taxonomy based on the interaction of type of innovation and locus of co-production |
| Djellal and Gallouj (2012) | To establish a dialogue between the fields of social and service innovation | Conceptual | Conceptualizes social innovation by emphasizing its social dimension as compared to manufacturing; describes the characteristics of social innovation | Identifies similarities in theoretical development between social and service innovation that contrasts with traditional manufacturing innovation research |
| Windrum et al. (2016) | To develop a framework that links social and service innovation research | Conceptual, with empirical illustration | Conceptualizes social innovation with an emphasis on social aspects of outcome and process, positioning it closer to service innovation | A multi-agent model of social innovation, synthesizing key concepts of the social and service innovation literatures |
| Harrison et al. (2010) | To capture one facet of social innovation in the service sector | Empirical case study | Defines social innovation as “Initiatives taken by social actors to respond to a need while being supported by public recognition” (s. 197) | Description of social innovation’s impact at different levels |
| Authors | Research aim | Type of paper | Definition/operationalization | Main contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| To develop a framework for understanding the relationship between social, service, and systems innovation | Conceptual | Defines social innovation as “the outcome of three elements: social goals prevalence (vs just business goals), social means for complex systemic co-productions (vs nonsystemic) and service and non-technological innovation outcomes (vs mainly goods-oriented outcomes)” | A three dimensional model of social innovation as the outcome of three elements | |
| Toivonen (2018) | To develop a research agenda for the examination of social and service innovation | Conceptual | Building on | Highlights the need for research exploring the nature of social innovation and development of governing structures and innovation policies |
| To develop a framework to elucidate the relationship between social and service innovation | Conceptual | Defines social innovation as “new service solutions to societal challenges aiming to increase welfare by value co-creation and co-implementation through co-production among multiple empowered actors” (s. 553) | A taxonomy based on the interaction of type of innovation and locus of co-production | |
| To establish a dialogue between the fields of social and service innovation | Conceptual | Conceptualizes social innovation by emphasizing its social dimension as compared to manufacturing; describes the characteristics of social innovation | Identifies similarities in theoretical development between social and service innovation that contrasts with traditional manufacturing innovation research | |
| To develop a framework that links social and service innovation research | Conceptual, with empirical illustration | Conceptualizes social innovation with an emphasis on social aspects of outcome and process, positioning it closer to service innovation | A multi-agent model of social innovation, synthesizing key concepts of the social and service innovation literatures | |
| To capture one facet of social innovation in the service sector | Empirical case study | Defines social innovation as “Initiatives taken by social actors to respond to a need while being supported by public recognition” (s. 197) | Description of social innovation’s impact at different levels |