Results of structural equation modeling
| Hypothesized relationships | Effectsa | Stderr | t-value | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fashion condition | ||||
| Self-presence → SE | 0.69*** | 0.06 | 11.22 | H1: confirmed |
| SEP → BCP | 0.28*** | 0.07 | 3.72 | H2: confirmed |
| SEP → BA | 0.29*** | 0.09 | 3.13 | H3: confirmed |
| Indirect effect: SEP → SE → BCP | 0.41*** | 0.06 | 6.44 | |
| Indirect effect: SEP→ SE → BA | 0.25*** | 0.07 | 3.62 | |
| Total effect: SEP → BCP | 0.68*** | 0.06 | 10.68 | |
| Total effect: SEP → BA | 0.54*** | 0.06 | 8.56 | |
| SE → BCP | 0.59*** | 0.07 | 7.38 | H4: confirmed |
| Indirect effect: SE → BCP→ BA | 0.19** | 0.07 | 2.60 | H5: confirmed |
| Total effect: SE → BA | 0.23** | 0.07 | 2.54 | |
| Direct effect: SE → BA | 0.04n.s. | 0.11 | 0.30 | |
| BCP → brand attitude | 0.33** | 0.13 | 2.78 | |
| Beauty condition | ||||
| Self-presence → SE | 0.69*** | 0.06 | 11.22 | H1: confirmed |
| SEP → BCP | 0.30*** | 0.07 | 4.13 | H2: confirmed |
| SEP → BA | 0.20** | 0.10 | 2.44 | H3: confirmed |
| Indirect effect: SEP → SE → BCP | 0.41*** | 0.06 | 6.45 | |
| Indirect effect: SEP → SE → BA | 0.25*** | 0.07 | 6.00 | |
| Total effect: SEP → BCP | 0.68*** | 0.06 | 10.78 | |
| Total effect: SEP → BA | 0.54*** | 0.07 | 9.84 | |
| SE → BCP | 0.59*** | 0.07 | 7.47 | H4: confirmed |
| Indirect effect: SE → BCP→ BA | 0.20** | 0.09 | 2.60 | H5: confirmed |
| Total effect: SE → BA | 0.38*** | 0.13 | 5.13 | |
| Direct effect: SE → BA | 0.19n.s. | 0.13 | 1.60 | |
| BCP → BA | 0.35*** | 0.15 | 3.13 |
| Hypothesized relationships | Effectsa | Stderr | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-presence → SE | 0.69*** | 0.06 | 11.22 | |
| SEP → BCP | 0.28*** | 0.07 | 3.72 | |
| SEP → BA | 0.29*** | 0.09 | 3.13 | |
| Indirect effect: SEP → SE → BCP | 0.41*** | 0.06 | 6.44 | |
| Indirect effect: SEP→ SE → BA | 0.25*** | 0.07 | 3.62 | |
| Total effect: SEP → BCP | 0.68*** | 0.06 | 10.68 | |
| Total effect: SEP → BA | 0.54*** | 0.06 | 8.56 | |
| SE → BCP | 0.59*** | 0.07 | 7.38 | |
| Indirect effect: SE → BCP→ BA | 0.19** | 0.07 | 2.60 | |
| Total effect: SE → BA | 0.23** | 0.07 | 2.54 | |
| Direct effect: SE → BA | 0.04n.s. | 0.11 | 0.30 | |
| BCP → brand attitude | 0.33** | 0.13 | 2.78 | |
| Self-presence → SE | 0.69*** | 0.06 | 11.22 | |
| SEP → BCP | 0.30*** | 0.07 | 4.13 | |
| SEP → BA | 0.20** | 0.10 | 2.44 | |
| Indirect effect: SEP → SE → BCP | 0.41*** | 0.06 | 6.45 | |
| Indirect effect: SEP → SE → BA | 0.25*** | 0.07 | 6.00 | |
| Total effect: SEP → BCP | 0.68*** | 0.06 | 10.78 | |
| Total effect: SEP → BA | 0.54*** | 0.07 | 9.84 | |
| SE → BCP | 0.59*** | 0.07 | 7.47 | |
| Indirect effect: SE → BCP→ BA | 0.20** | 0.09 | 2.60 | |
| Total effect: SE → BA | 0.38*** | 0.13 | 5.13 | |
| Direct effect: SE → BA | 0.19n.s. | 0.13 | 1.60 | |
| BCP → BA | 0.35*** | 0.15 | 3.13 |
Notes:
SE = self-explorative engagement; SEP = self-presence; BA = brand attitude, BCP; brand cognitive processing; astandardized effect; Stderr = standard error; critical t-value (one-tailed) = 1.645. ***p<0.001; **p<0.01; n.s.p>0.05
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.