Table 6

Results of structural equation modeling

Hypothesized relationshipsEffectsaStderrt-valueResult
Fashion condition    
Self-presence → SE0.69***0.0611.22H1: confirmed
SEP → BCP0.28***0.073.72H2: confirmed
SEP → BA0.29***0.093.13H3: confirmed
Indirect effect: SEP → SE → BCP0.41***0.066.44 
Indirect effect: SEP→ SE → BA0.25***0.073.62 
Total effect: SEP → BCP0.68***0.0610.68 
Total effect: SEP → BA0.54***0.068.56 
SE → BCP0.59***0.077.38H4: confirmed
Indirect effect: SE → BCP→ BA0.19**0.072.60H5: confirmed
Total effect: SE → BA0.23**0.072.54 
Direct effect: SE → BA0.04n.s.0.110.30 
BCP → brand attitude0.33**0.132.78 
Beauty condition    
Self-presence → SE0.69***0.0611.22H1: confirmed
SEP → BCP0.30***0.074.13H2: confirmed
SEP → BA0.20**0.102.44H3: confirmed
Indirect effect: SEP → SE → BCP0.41***0.066.45 
Indirect effect: SEP → SE → BA0.25***0.076.00 
Total effect: SEP → BCP0.68***0.0610.78 
Total effect: SEP → BA0.54***0.079.84 
SE → BCP0.59***0.077.47H4: confirmed
Indirect effect: SE → BCP→ BA0.20**0.092.60H5: confirmed
Total effect: SE → BA0.38***0.135.13 
Direct effect: SE → BA0.19n.s.0.131.60 
BCP → BA0.35***0.153.13 

Notes:

SE = self-explorative engagement; SEP = self-presence; BA = brand attitude, BCP; brand cognitive processing; astandardized effect; Stderr = standard error; critical t-value (one-tailed) = 1.645. ***p<0.001; **p<0.01; n.s.p>0.05

Source: Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options