Results of robust least squares method
| Variables | Coefficient | Std. Error | z-Statistic | Prob |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.091 | 0.058 | 1.712 | 0.106 |
| Gender | −0.703 | 1.233 | −0.570 | 0.568 |
| Education | 0.357a | 0.102 | 3.483 | 0.000 |
| Household size | −0.184 | 0.198 | −0.925 | 0.354 |
| Experience | 0.116 | 0.071 | 1.626 | 0.103 |
| Landholding size | 0.123b | 0.060 | 2.034 | 0.041 |
| Farm status | −0.224 | 1.415 | −0.158 | 0.874 |
| Livestock | −0.582 | 0.936 | −0.622 | 0.533 |
| Road access | 1.687c | 0.956 | 1.764 | 0.077 |
| Extension | 1.587a | 0.340 | 4.668 | 0.000 |
| Distance | −0.168a | 0.051 | −3.303 | 0.001 |
| Constant | −2.371 | 3.675 | −0.645 | 0.518 |
| Sensitivity analysis | ||||
| R2 | 0.658 | |||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.610 | |||
| Variables | Coefficient | Std. Error | Prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.091 | 0.058 | 1.712 | 0.106 |
| Gender | −0.703 | 1.233 | −0.570 | 0.568 |
| Education | 0.357a | 0.102 | 3.483 | 0.000 |
| Household size | −0.184 | 0.198 | −0.925 | 0.354 |
| Experience | 0.116 | 0.071 | 1.626 | 0.103 |
| Landholding size | 0.123b | 0.060 | 2.034 | 0.041 |
| Farm status | −0.224 | 1.415 | −0.158 | 0.874 |
| Livestock | −0.582 | 0.936 | −0.622 | 0.533 |
| Road access | 1.687c | 0.956 | 1.764 | 0.077 |
| Extension | 1.587a | 0.340 | 4.668 | 0.000 |
| Distance | −0.168a | 0.051 | −3.303 | 0.001 |
| Constant | −2.371 | 3.675 | −0.645 | 0.518 |
| 0.658 | ||||
| Adjusted | 0.610 | |||
Note(s): a, b and c significant at 1, 5 and 10% probability levels, respectively
Source(s): Field survey data (2017)
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.