Marginal effects on probability of being informal using formal agglomeration as an explanation variable
| Explanatory variable | Probit | IV-probit |
|---|---|---|
| ln (formal agglomeration) | −0.1174 (0.0185)*** | −0.344 (0.041)*** |
| Size of the firm | (–) | (–) |
| Industrial sectors (47) | Yes | Yes |
| Distance from CBD | Yes | Yes |
| Distance from main corridors | Yes | Yes |
| Number of observations | 51,454 | 51,454 |
| F-statistic (weak instrument) | 27.37 |
| Explanatory variable | Probit | IV-probit |
|---|---|---|
| ln (formal agglomeration) | −0.1174 (0.0185)*** | −0.344 (0.041)*** |
| Size of the firm | (–) | (–) |
| Industrial sectors (47) | Yes | Yes |
| Distance from CBD | Yes | Yes |
| Distance from main corridors | Yes | Yes |
| Number of observations | 51,454 | 51,454 |
| 27.37 |
Notes:
Marginal effects at the means of the independent variables. Clustered standard errors by neighbourhood in parenthesis; *** p < 0.01
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.