Marginal effects controlling the distance 1 km from liquefaction limit
| Explanatory variable | Probit | IV-probit |
|---|---|---|
| ln (Agglomeration) | −0.1103 (0.035)*** | −0.4197 (0.1419)*** |
| Size of the firm | (–) | (–) |
| Industrial sectors (47) | Yes | Yes |
| Distance from CBD | Yes | Yes |
| Distance from main corridors | Yes | Yes |
| Number of observations | 12,850 | 12,850 |
| F-statistic (weak instrument) | 4.48 |
| Explanatory variable | Probit | IV-probit |
|---|---|---|
| ln (Agglomeration) | −0.1103 (0.035) | −0.4197 (0.1419) |
| Size of the firm | (–) | (–) |
| Industrial sectors (47) | Yes | Yes |
| Distance from CBD | Yes | Yes |
| Distance from main corridors | Yes | Yes |
| Number of observations | 12,850 | 12,850 |
| 4.48 |
Notes:
Marginal effects at the means of the independent variables. Clustered standard errors by neighbourhood in parenthesis; *** p < 0.01; ** p < 0.05; * p < 0.10
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.