Results of ANOVA on carbon management practices
| Carbon management practice | Climate explorer (A) | Wait-and-see hesitator (B) | Cautious attempter (C) | Climate laggard (D) | Duncan’s test | F-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-carbon product development | 4.7 | 3.4 | 4.2 | 2.7 | A=C>C=B>B=D | 8.71** |
| Low-carbon process improvement | 5.2 | 4.6 | 5.0 | 4.3 | A=C=B>B=D | 2.93* |
| Employee engagement | 4.9 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.6 | A>B=C=D | 4.17* |
| Initiative participation | 5.1 | 4.2 | 5.0 | 3.9 | A=C=B>B=D | 4.17** |
| Supply chain cooperation | 4.7 | 3.4 | 3.9 | 2.9 | A=C>C=B>B=D | 7.53** |
| No. of cases | 22 (23.4%) | 24 (25.5%) | 17 (18.1%) | 31 (33.0%) |
| Carbon management practice | Climate explorer (A) | Wait-and-see hesitator | Cautious attempter (C) | Climate laggard (D) | Duncan’s test | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-carbon product development | 4.7 | 3.4 | 4.2 | 2.7 | A=C>C=B>B=D | 8.71 |
| Low-carbon process improvement | 5.2 | 4.6 | 5.0 | 4.3 | A=C=B>B=D | 2.93 |
| Employee engagement | 4.9 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.6 | A>B=C=D | 4.17 |
| Initiative participation | 5.1 | 4.2 | 5.0 | 3.9 | A=C=B>B=D | 4.17 |
| Supply chain cooperation | 4.7 | 3.4 | 3.9 | 2.9 | A=C>C=B>B=D | 7.53 |
| No. of cases | 22 (23.4%) | 24 (25.5%) | 17 (18.1%) | 31 (33.0%) |
Notes:
p < 0.1;
p < 0.5;
p < 0.01
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.