Table VII

Differences-in-differences results of agricultural lending by US banks, 2008–2017

(1)(2)(3)(4)
SpecificationAgricultural Loan VolumeΔ(Ag Loan)Ag Loan/Total LoanΔ(Ag Loan/Total Loan)
Panel A: US agricultural banks
Post Regulation0.106*** (0.0062)−0.00115 (0.0047)0.0303*** (0.0021)−0.0222*** (0.0029)
Post Reg × Regulated−0.0561*** (0.019)−0.0344*** (0.013)−0.0279*** (0.0067)−0.0234** (0.0095)
Control variablesYesYesYesYes
Bank-fixed effectsYesYesYesYes
R20.6020.0350.1370.022
No. of Observation9,7609,7609,7609,760
Panel B: All US banks
Post Regulation0.134*** (0.011)0.00712 (0.0065)0.0176*** (0.0009)−0.0218*** (0.0055)
Post Reg × Regulated−0.0900*** (0.027)0.0103 (0.015)−0.0155*** (0.0013)−0.0110 (0.013)
Control variablesYesYesYesYes
Bank-fixed effectsYesYesYesYes
R20.1520.0070.0540.002
No. of observation36,52736,52736,52736,527

Notes: This table reports results from panel regressions for Equation (2), from December 31, 2008, to December 31, 2017. Panels A and B report regression results for US agricultural banks and all US banks, respectively. Following the FDIC definition, any commercial bank with agricultural production loans plus real estate loans secured by farmland exceeding 25 percent of total loans and leases is categorized as an agricultural bank. All regressions include previously discussed control variables and bank-fixed effects. Standard errors are clustered on bank level. *,**,***Significant at 10, 5 and 1 percent levels, respectively

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal