Test results of regulation effect in technological leapfrogging stage
| Variables | Dependent variable: firm innovation performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
| Step1: control | |||
| Firm size | 0.290*** | 0.152*** | 0.088** |
| Firm age | 0.010 | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Industry | 0.283 | 0.126 | 0.110 |
| Constant | 2.694*** | 0.544 | 2.996*** |
| Step2: main effects | |||
| Following stage (FS) | −0.097 | −2.476*** | |
| Synchronization stage (SS) | −0.239 | −3.328*** | |
| Leading stage (LS) | 0.401* | 0.319 | |
| Capability evolution (CE) | 0.460*** | 0.996*** | |
| Capability substitution (CS) | 0.271*** | −0.769*** | |
| Step3: moderated effects | |||
| CE*FS | −0.233* | ||
| CE*SS | −0.855*** | ||
| CE*LS | −1.345*** | ||
| CS*FS | 0.795*** | ||
| CS*SS | 1.609*** | ||
| CS*LS | 1.241*** | ||
| R2 | 0.125 | 0.515 | 0.750 |
| ΔR2 | 0.125 | 0.390 | 0.235 |
| ΔF | 13.583*** | 45.145*** | 43.109*** |
| Variables | Dependent variable: firm innovation performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
| Firm size | 0.290 | 0.152 | 0.088 |
| Firm age | 0.010 | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Industry | 0.283 | 0.126 | 0.110 |
| Constant | 2.694 | 0.544 | 2.996 |
| Following stage (FS) | −0.097 | −2.476 | |
| Synchronization stage (SS) | −0.239 | −3.328 | |
| Leading stage ( | 0.401 | 0.319 | |
| Capability evolution ( | 0.460 | 0.996 | |
| Capability substitution ( | 0.271 | −0.769 | |
| −0.233 | |||
| −0.855 | |||
| −1.345 | |||
| 0.795 | |||
| 1.609 | |||
| 1.241 | |||
| 0.125 | 0.515 | 0.750 | |
| Δ | 0.125 | 0.390 | 0.235 |
| Δ | 13.583 | 45.145 | 43.109 |
Notes:
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01;
p < 0.001