Table 2.

Bootstrap CIs for indirect, direct and total effects of effort expectancy and perceived usefulness on preference for teleworking based on counterfactuals

VariablesEffects of predictors
Estimate (95% CI)
ORs
Estimate (95% CI)
Effort expectancy (dummy 1)
Tot natural IE−0.01 (−0.05–0.02)0.91 (0.70–1.15)
Pure natural DE0.01 (−0.09–0.15)1.06 (0.44–3.40)
Total effect−0.00 (−0.10–0.14)0.96 (0.37–3.22)
Effort expectancy (dummy 2)
Tot natural IE−0.02 (−0.05 – −0.01)0.65 (0.49–0.80)
Pure natural DE−0.06 (−0.13 – −0.00)0.53 (0.28–0.97)
Total effect−0.08 (−0.17 – −0.02)0.34 (0.17–0.63)
Perceived usefulness
Tot natural IE0.20 (0.12–0.30)3.73 (2.69–5.49)
Pure natural DE0.57 (0.44–0.70)15.77 (7.60–55.12)
Total effect0.77 (0.66–0.86)58.74 (28.08–217.46)

Notes:

CI = confidence interval; Tot natural IE = total natural indirect effect; pure natural DE = pure natural direct effect

Source: Table by author

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal