The comparison of path coefficients in year 2014 vs year 2016
| Paths | r2014 | r2016 | Path coefficients difference |r2014−r2016| | p-value (difference) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON→ATM | 0.29*** | 0.26*** | 0.02 | 0.20 |
| ST→ATM | −0.29*** | −0.25*** | 0.04 | 0.93 |
| FB→ATM | 0.07*** | 0.09*** | 0.02 | 0.75 |
| Age→ATM | 0.03ns | 0.02ns | 0.00 | 0.45 |
| Gender→ATM | −0.08*** | −0.04** | 0.04 | 0.94 |
| Edu→ATM | 0.20*** | 0.15*** | 0.05 | 0.02 |
| Paths | Path coefficients difference | | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON→ATM | 0.29*** | 0.26*** | 0.02 | 0.20 |
| ST→ATM | −0.29*** | −0.25*** | 0.04 | 0.93 |
| FB→ATM | 0.07*** | 0.09*** | 0.02 | 0.75 |
| Age→ATM | 0.03ns | 0.02ns | 0.00 | 0.45 |
| Gender→ATM | −0.08*** | −0.04** | 0.04 | 0.94 |
| Edu→ATM | 0.20*** | 0.15*** | 0.05 | 0.02 |
Notes: **,****The path coefficients are significant at the 0.01 and 0.001 levels, respectively
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.